Local Congressmen respond to bailout package Save Email Print
But local congressmen say it's needed
Posted: 7:36 PM Sep 26, 2008
Last Updated: 7:36 PM Sep 26, 2008
Reporter: Mark Peterson
Email Address: mpeterson@wndu.com

A | A | A

The heat is on, and the stakes are said to be high in Washington D.C.

Congress continues fast paced negotiations on a $700-billion bailout package designed to stabilize the country's financial markets.

Two members of the local congressional delegation say the package has been unpopular with constituents back home, yet both agree that action is needed.

Indiana Third District U.S. Representative Mark Souder says his office has received approximately 800-calls in the last 48 hours, and that “hardly anybody” wants him to vote for the bill.

Nonetheless, Souder feels that some type of package is needed, although he’s not sure it’s the one on the table. “I don’t necessarily think it has to be $700-billion and I don’t necessarily agree that it has to be done tomorrow,” Souder said.

Some fear that the proposal has been wrongly labeled as a bailout bill for bad behaving Wall Street speculators.

They contend it’s more like a Main Street protection package to keep the folks back home from feeling the mortgage crisis fallout.

“If you can’t get a car loan…all of the sudden nobody’s selling cars, nobody’s building cars,” said U.S. Representative Joseph Donnelly, (D) Indiana’s Second District. “I’m privileged to represent Kokomo where they build all the transmissions for Chrysler. There won’t be anybody building transmissions unless there are cars being sold.”

But the sheer price of the bailout package itself is enough to give any congressman sticker shock.

“I think they've had so much opposition on both sides that they're going to have to come back with a smaller package,” said Congressman Souder.

In general, Souder feels that deliberations have been moving a bit too fast.

“We’ve already seen multiple bailouts,” he said. “We’ve already taken over Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac, we’ve already taken over 80-percent of A.I.G. Now they’re coming back with this, and the question is hey, explain this a little better than you’ve been doing. We’re tired of writing blank checks.”

The question that can’t be answered is ‘how much time congress has for deliberations—before it’s too late.

“The one thing we can't do is to simply do nothing,” said Congressman Donnelly.

Donnelly said he would remain in Washington as long as it took to get the job done.

Representative Souder sees the deliberations as a “high stakes poker game.”

Souder says if congress doesn’t act, “the bottom is going to keep dropping, but how rapidly? If we do do it, we’re in effect providing the average taxpayer is taking over a huge risk with very little explanation.”

More Stories
IU law professor joins Obama's transition team

Indiana man accused of robbing southern Ill. bank

Great Dane laying off half its Terre Haute work force

Man charged in Hamilton County courthouse scuffle

Appeal denied in 12-year-old's 1992 torture death

Whirlpool plans to lay off 100 at Evansville

Police maintain tight security following threats at Triton

BMV reverses decision on "BE GODS" license plate

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Christine Location: Indiana on Oct 4, 2008 at 07:07 PM
Mark Souder has shown that he does NOT represent the people. He admits that almost no one wanted to bail these private bankers out of their bad business practices, yet he saddled up to the bankers anyway, in spite of the people! It's so easy to spend someone else's money isn't it? The package got even worse for the people, going from 700 billion to 850 billion, and from a few pages to nearly 500! Congress should be required to at least READ a bill before voting on it! Just like with NAFTA and the PATRIOT ACT, Congressmen voted without taking the time to read and really understand the unconstitutional measures involved. This is nothing more than a continued transfer of wealth, from the people to the global elite. Congress knew about this problem and were warned at least 9 years ago, but did nothing. This bill is not limited to just rescuing loans in our country, but loans in other countries. They want OUR money for loans in OTHER countries! Time to vote these socialists out!

Posted by: Rebecca Location: Texas on Oct 3, 2008 at 01:28 PM
I feel once again that the government is not listening to what the American people wanted. We did not want a bailout. We have been following this closely with Loy Dobbs and Dave Ramsey and others and their were other ways to bailout this situation and our government did not care to listen. I have no confidence anymore in this countrys decision making. The government should have looked at other options, and not be looking after themselves and their bad decisions. Tthey are criminal for doing this to US, the American people that work so hard to make ends meet. Shame on you. Who is your GOD? Money is your God-not the heavenly father, whom our hope should be in and to whom we should seek.

Posted by: Linda Location: Indiana on Oct 1, 2008 at 03:59 PM
Disperse any relief funding among the people who had loans and/or savings with these financial institutions. We shouldn't be responsible for bailing out executives who failed to do their jobs properly. Use the bail out money to allow people losing their homes to pay off their loans. Better yet, take that $700 billion dollars and divide it among the tax paying, legal citizens of the US and let us get the economy back where it should be. The government hasn't managed to control funding. The bankers haven't managed to control it, either. Give the people an opportunity, rather than asking them to sacrifice more so the people who have already abused them can have another go at it.

Posted by: PAM Location: ROCHESTER on Sep 28, 2008 at 08:30 AM
I DON'T THINK THAT WE SHOULD BAIL THEM OUT..

Posted by: Becky Location: so bend on Sep 27, 2008 at 08:17 PM
Real estate brokers appraisers,banks,they all drove housing prices up SO fast this was bound to happen GREED. Why can't these banks just give people fixed rates and let people skip a couple of payments and add them on to the end of their term till things get better.The gov should put a stop to all the late fees, high interest rates.I know alot of people would love to pay their bills the right way but these big banks are robbing us blind,the gov lets them, now they get the help.What about the people losing their houses and everything else? Maybe they used to much money, but do you see any ceo or vise president of a company scraping to buy a car or groceries? We all want a better life

Posted by: Dana Location: Buchanan on Sep 27, 2008 at 07:41 PM
This ONE had a few people write a book for him long ago that predicts what would take place in the future with people being in love with money and it would be the root of all evil- it also predicted a coming world order which many of our great politicians now refer to. It also tells of a one world economy and religion which we are slowly slipping into and with this finicial crisis you can see it happening with our ecomony on the verge of collapse. One person is soon coming who will have the answer to everything and everyone will worship him except for a few.Their will also be coming times as never have been seen on the face of this earth. The only ones who will not worship him are those who have their name wrote in another book- the book of life. So if you do not want to worship this beast accept Jesus as your lord and savior and repent and be baptized and your name also will be wrote in the book of life. Have faith. Oh by the way- the book that was wrote is called the BIBLE

Posted by: pay your own way on Sep 27, 2008 at 04:36 PM
Most of you whiners are probably using govt. money already. Whose brilliant idea was it to give mortgages to people that can't afford to pay them? If people would work instead of relying on the govt and live within their means the economy would take care of itself. All the unemployed people I know say they can't find a job. Truth is they don't want a job and aren't looking very hard. Can I borrow your food stamps?

Posted by: Tom Location: Centreville on Sep 27, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Pat, if you think that it was the democratically controlled congress that got us to this point, you don’t understand the dynamics of the situation. Deregulation, lack of oversight, and the “Greed is good” mentality begun with the Reagan administration are the causes for this. Instant gratification in the financial world is a recipe for disaster, and that is exactly where we are right now. Bush dragging us into this unending war spending (and wasting) an obscene amount of money, which had to be borrowed, devalued the dollar. The first 6 years of the Bush administration with it’s rubber stamp Republican congress did more to set the stage for this disaster than the do nothing congress where the Democrats have been in a majority (but only if the 1 independent senator votes with them) for the last 21 months.

Posted by: Captain Dan Location: South Bend on Sep 27, 2008 at 08:46 AM
If Pelosi, Reid and Franks are for it you know it is laiden with pork and socialist regulation. Do the math and divide 200 million into 700 billion and see what each person over 18 in America would get and what you would do with it. And yah, send it with an apology for over taxing us all these years.

Posted by: not in debt on Sep 27, 2008 at 08:15 AM
Ladies and gentlemen the days of living a "champagne life on a beer salary are over." Cut your credit cards in 2 pieces and start living the way your grandparents did.

Posted by: Dan Location: SB on Sep 26, 2008 at 11:53 AM
You can pretend that there is a constitution...but actions like this (give me a blank check and don't hold me accountable for what I spend it on) just tell me the constitution and our way of life is dead. The gov't is going to do whatever they want, whenever they want to and until the sleeping giant (aka the general masses) wake up from their comcast and PS2 stupor and grow some big ones, we're just going to sit idly by and watch it happen. A vote for either candidate on the ballot is "more of the same". You might as well write in "bugs bunny" on the ballot and cast your vote. I'm sure not voting McBama in 2008. Ron Paul still makes the most sense...at least to me.

Posted by: Pat on Sep 26, 2008 at 11:18 AM
jl - yes vote republican because a democratic congress got us to this point.

Posted by: Disturbed One Location: Osceola on Sep 26, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Just keep in mind who voted to bail out the rich and stupid come election time !!!

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 26, 2008 at 09:36 AM
anon posted 9:40am - The media has barely glossed over the financial disaster. Hang out at some financial blogs and it is MUCH MUCH MUCH worse. Your solution of suspending the mark to market rule will do no good. The financial community already knows that those assets are not performing. No one will buy them. So instead Paulson and Bernake have the great idea of sticking it with the tax payer. Great idea!!! (sarcasm) The problem is those assets will never recover, because they are MBS (Mortgage Backed Securities) and with a huge surplus of houses that as of now are still unused the price of houses are going to continue to spiral down. So they will never recover even if the economy by some miracle of god turns around. It will not happen. Instead of blaming a good transparency law, blame the federal reserve for maintaining a loose monetary policy of easy lending. Look at the history of central banking and fiat currencies. There is no success in history, somehow we're different??

Posted by: Farmer Frank Location: Rural Marshall County on Sep 26, 2008 at 09:16 AM
Difficult times will indeed force people to look at what is important to them. If living in exess on borrowed money is a way of life, many many are about to have a rude awakening to a new way of life. Having a downpayment to purchase a home will be necessary. Having 30% down to purchase an auto will be necessary. Its about time that we the people become responsible for ourselves and quit forcing the Government to bail us out when we are in too far. Thousands of homes are over valued, not on the basis of availability but on the basis of over appraised value. Its always interesting to see that we want something functional when things arent going well, but we want lavish things when things are going well. Provide for today, save for tomorrow, and count your blessings. We have so much more that most of the world, yet we are caught up in the fear of loosing something that noone can take away..We are Americans, buckle down and get your house in order..Have Faith, exercise it daily!!!

Posted by: anon Location: here on Sep 26, 2008 at 08:40 AM
In a world and age of choices, i do not see any given. We are having the Bailout crammed down our necks. Frannie and Freddie were started decades ago with certain gov't assurances, that bailout is completely understandable. But this 700 billion bailout is not understandable. If they would temperarily suppend the Mark to Market accounting rule, the companies balance sheets would come back into balance and the ratios needed for others to lend money to them will be restored. the mark to market rule was created to provide transparency after enron and the sarbanes oxley law, i would temperarily sacrafice transparency for the good of the economy. I also blame the news organizations for making this market down turn into an outright panic by the "sky is falling" chicken little reporting mentality. Many individual investors would not have pulled out of the market if they were not screaming the world is comming to an end. accounting student-mishawaka

Posted by: jl Location: laporte on Sep 26, 2008 at 08:40 AM
this country is so screwed up just remember when you vote who got us here if you want more of the same then you know how to vote

Posted by: Josh Location: South Bend on Sep 26, 2008 at 08:22 AM
Linda in Granger - Have you thought about if this package goes through? You say you're counting on social security to be there. The difference is, if it's still there the money they give you won't have the purchasing power. This is INFLATIONARY. They don't have the money to begin with, the 700 billion is being conjured out of thin air. The dollar is already worth less than it was at the begining of this decade. The Federal Reserve is the PRIME reason we are in this mess, do you honestly think they can fix it when it was they who broke it? The Federal Reserve and the treasury are in a catch 22. If they sit back the market implodes due to DEFLATION. If they sit back after the implosion it will be much quicker to recover than if they interfere like the last great depression. If they get the 700 billion package we experiance INFLATION. There has NEVER been a successful fiat currency in the world, we are no different. Our fate was sealed when the gold standard was dropped.

Posted by: jeff on Sep 26, 2008 at 07:52 AM
the way its going how are we to pay for there mistakes whers the jobs

Posted by: Tom Location: Centreville on Sep 26, 2008 at 07:01 AM
The government has to do something in order to keep the money flowing that allows us to buy products and keep most of the people working. However, Bush’s proposal included the following verbiage in section 8. “Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” Another huge power grab by this administration. His terms are, give me the money but you have no control or oversight after that. I do agree with some of the other posts, the persons running these institutions that need to be bailed out should have their incomes reviewed for the past 5 years and any bonus moneys or excessive compensation should be seized. They made decisions that were hugely risky and made great short term profit, but were unsustainable in the long run. They shouldn’t be allowed to walk away with their “ill gotten gain” after this collapse.

Posted by: Linda Location: Granger on Sep 26, 2008 at 06:45 AM
A lot of you keep saying let the governemnt crash. Just let it go. Have you stopped to think that when it does, there goes your retirement savings, your social security etc. It's not just the governement and financial institutions that will suffer but everyone will lose and lose big. Maybe all of you have a lot of money in a mattress somewhere but I was counting on social security to be there in a few years when I need it. If it's not I'll fast become a homeless person. What about all the senior citizens who already are struggling with heating costs and food and medications. What would happen to them? The politicians, TV personalities and athletes need to take a huge paycut and the country would be better off. No one needs to live in a house that costs in the millions. That's just ridiculous.

Posted by: c on Sep 26, 2008 at 05:16 AM
well were all going to die and be and poverty..i'm not worried all this stuff in the news means that jesus is coming

Posted by: Tator on Sep 25, 2008 at 09:37 PM
Our government doesnt care about us that is why they chased off our jobs, raised our gas, sold our country, killing our children, & taxing us out of our homes. I heard on the radio about 1½ years ago the crook himself GW Bush say americans have a ton of money in savings and I thought to myself how does he know that should be private the freeking tax was already paid right? Well I figured he was looking to break us why else would he look at our savings accounts? Another thing im a hard working american with 2 uncurable dieases just trying to support my family and I wasnt entitled to the $300.00 or $600.00 that everyone was suppose to get which didnt matter because thsy just get it back 10 time more but I was peed because our accountant said we would get it so I figure it was for the rich and the dont work people not the hard working americans. How many of you didnt get your check? I can't see why we are bailing everyone out when our people are loosing everything. Congress needs change

Posted by: Don't Do It! Location: Mishawaka, IN on Sep 25, 2008 at 08:48 PM
I agree - Let it crash! Let those greedy men jump from 10 story buildings. I'm so tired of paying (literally) for the mistakes of the greed in government! I'm so tired of politicians policing what I do and noone is policing them! I'm tired of the government not being governed! You waste my money and many others - carelessly! Let those CEO's and Exec's lose their jobs and their fancy houses! Let them feel what society is feeling. They'll feel the pinch with no job and 4.00/gallon gas prices! 700 billion? Sounds like there is some padding of pockets somewhere! I said it 8 years ago and I'll say it again - If another Bush goes into office - America will lose it's value! Give that 700 billion to hard working Americans! The ones who lost their houses because of this - give it to our schools - to the public service officers who are the ones protecting us! If this 700 billion package goes through - this will not be the end! Why would our government even be willing to talk deals with them?

Posted by: Viewer Location: Niles on Sep 25, 2008 at 07:45 PM
Let the market crash. Let it go naturally. Artificially putting our money into the system where greed and corporate gambling by speculators and CEOs went on a spree is not the answer. Let it go. Let it crash. It will come back again.

Posted by: Walkerton on Sep 25, 2008 at 07:12 PM
I object to the bailout with taxpayer money. Why should I bail out these private companies because overpaid execs made bad decisions. Taxpayer pay while the execs get high pay checks and bonuses, stock holders get dividens , and they go on unchecked. We did not bailout the private RV manufacturers or other private businesses. Wall Street speculators, oil companies, and gov't agencies are to blame. GREED. Let them work there own way out

Posted by: Chaz Location: South Bend on Sep 25, 2008 at 06:37 PM
All these free market capitalists are now in favor of socializing things. Isn't that ironic?

Posted by: Kevin Location: Mishawaka on Sep 25, 2008 at 06:21 PM
put those ceo in jail where they belong.

Posted by: luis morales on Sep 25, 2008 at 05:25 PM
Congress shouldn't bail these institutions out, it should take them over. Fire and arrest the CEOs involved, sieze all of their assets here and overseas under the Federal Racketeering Laws and set all mortgages at 1% above the prime rate. This would allow homeowners to keep their homes and encourage new people to purchase homes. They should make money available to those institutions that didn't engage in risky practises at the prime rate. This would re-energize our economy and get rid of the bad banks who our president wants us to help. This would keep us from continuing to waste our money on George W. Bush's friends.

Posted by: steve Location: plymouth on Sep 25, 2008 at 05:15 PM
let all the fat cat fall!!!why do they need tax payers money.i need more money come on bush loan me about 70 millon

Posted by: Bear Location: Mishawaka on Sep 25, 2008 at 05:10 PM
They are going to do it any way lets make sure the big exects and salary earners learn their lesson by requireing them to work for a minimum of one year for minimum wage and no bonuse or incentive