Zoning board approves cell tower at Humane Society
Zoning board approves cell tower at Humane Society Save Email Print
Posted: 7:06 PM Aug 12, 2008
Last Updated: 11:15 PM Aug 12, 2008
Reporter: Ryan Famuliner
Email Address: ryan.famuliner@wndu.com

A | A | A

The Board of Zoning Appeals gave its approval Tuesday night for a cell tower at the Humane Society.

The St. Joseph County Humane Society is doing all it can to raise money to build a new facility, and that includes proposing to raise a 150-foot cell tower on its property.

Neighbors worry about their property values, and are also unenthusiastic about having to see the tower on a daily basis.

But the Humane Society says the tower could bring in thousands of dollars every month.

"It's going to be a positive thing for the shelter. Our utility bills are going up every day, as you know, so these are the things we need to do to make a stable income for us," explained Humane Society director Dr. Carol Ecker.

"It's probably a decent moneymaker. It's going to provide revenue for them, but, you know, not at my expense. You know, there's other ways to do it -- they could do a fundraiser or whatever they have to do," said Terry Patnaude, who lives near the Humane Society.

The Humane Society plans to put the tower at the back of the property, and says trees should block it from plain sight.

With a favorable recommendation from the zoning board, it is now up to Mishawaka's City Council to decide whether the Humane Society can put in the cell tower.



(The original story from Tuesday evening)

The St. Joseph County Humane Society has been asking for a lot of donations lately, but now they're looking for a new way make some extra money, and it has neighbors irritated.

The humane society wants to build a 150-foot tall cell tower on their property on Grape Rd.

Tuesday night, the Mishawaka zoning board is heard public input on whether they think the city should make an exception, and let the humane society build the tower.

Neighbors, as you might expect, are doing all they can to stop the tower from going up.

For the humane society, the possibility of thousands of dollars of extra income each month was too good to pass up.

“AT&T approached us about putting a cell tower on our property... It'd be something we could use to pay our utilities and since we're going to build here, it’s a good thing,” said Dr. Carol Ecker, the Director of the Humane Society.

But not too far away, it's not considered such a good thing.

“I don’t think anyone in the circle or the cul de sac is in favor of it,” said Dixie Mason, who says she and her neighbors received letters notifying them of the humane society’s appeal.

Neighbors say they've written letters and called board members to voice their opposition.

“My property over there is adjacent right in back of the humane society, so I would probably see more of the tower more than most people,” said Terry Patnaude, another neighbor.

The humane society says the tower on the back of their property should be blocked from view, by trees.

“It’s going to be very innocuous and people should not complain. It’s probably one of the last places you could hide a cell tower in Mishawaka and have it not be seen, visually, from the road,” Dr. Ecker said.

The neighbors think it will be an eyesore from their view.

“There’s one already placed over there that we can see above the trees, and apparently this one’s even going to be taller, so it is going to be visible,” Mason said, referring to a small tower the humane society has toward the front of its building.

The humane society sees the new tower as a way to possibly help pay for a new building.

“We've had to squish our plans down from a $5 million building to a $2 million building. So this will help subsidize the income we need for this type of building,” Dr. Ecker said.

Neighbors say they understand, but don’t agree.

“I do have a love for animals and I hope there’s some way they can resolve their financial situation, but not at our expense,” said Bob Mason, Dixie’s husband.

The humane society's land isn't zoned for the tower, but they're not asking to change the zoning. They’re asking for an exception to allow the tower, that usually could only be built in an industrial area.

Neighbors are still worried that might open the door to other development, and are worried about their property values.

After Tuesday’s public hearing the board will vote, and that yes or no recommendation will be passed on to the Mishawaka common council, who ultimately will make the decision.

More Stories
ATF agents raid the Warsaw home of a known white supremacist

Granger man turns hobby into business with D'Avella Family Winery

Update: Woman and children recovering after car crashes into store window

U93 kicks off annual Roofsit campaign to help prevent child abuse

Part of Cleveland Avenue closed in St. Joe

Man hospitalized after motorcycle accident

80-year-old Niles man shot, robbed at home; suspects arrested

Golfer Chris Smith and family still in shock over weekend accident

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: ?? on Aug 21, 2008 at 07:28 AM
Jane- Are you sure they were limp? I only ask because this would suggest they were recently euthenized. You cannot dump recently euthenized animals because the sodium used is still in their system, if any wildlife decided to eat any of those bodies ...well you can imagine the outcome.

Posted by: jane Location: buchanan on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:29 PM
The landfill is located in Buchanan, MI and the dog wasn't in a container, they pulled it from the van. The thing that really disturbes me is that all these animals were still limp.

Posted by: Genie Location: Mishawaka on Aug 19, 2008 at 08:13 PM
Someone needs to check into this story about the cats being dumped at the Berrien County Landfill. Did Dr. Ecker actually admit to authorizing that????

Posted by: ?? on Aug 19, 2008 at 06:01 PM
Jane- Your story disturbs me, I'm not sure what excuses Ecker would make about what you saw. I can only imagine that just one 55 gallon barrel would hold a lot of cats, but four of them full, with at least one dog?? That's a lot of cats. Your sighting kinda contradicts their public statements saying they're "No Kill". Where exactly is this landfill located?

Posted by: Hazel Location: Mishawaka on Aug 19, 2008 at 04:45 PM
Well, they had to stop using the agrilyzer because it was backing up in to the dog park. They tried to deny that fact,but it was a little convenient that when the agrilyzer situation was brought to light they all of the sudden stopped using it. Ecker, you can't do anything right.

Posted by: genie Location: mishawaka on Aug 19, 2008 at 02:57 PM
In regards to the Humane Society dumping dead animals at the Berrien County Landfill.....has anyone checked to see if it is legal to do that???????

Posted by: vicki Location: south Bend on Aug 19, 2008 at 02:32 PM
This is a snipet from a article recently read about animal deaths and cell towers I may have to send this in 2 postings... Its a eye opener that maybe this isnt a very good idea. Health officials ponder farm’s dead animal toll. “Rabbits, goats - even a horse - are among the roughly 100 animals to mysteriously die at a Nova Scotia farm in the past five years. And with the recent deaths of a number of wild birds at the farm, the Natural Resources Department has stepped in and sent one of the animal carcasses to the Atlantic Veterinary College for testing.”….”after years of questions”….”the cause: a cellphone relay tower erected beside the farm. A tenant on the farm for the last two years,”… “the farm’s owner purchased the property about a year before the cell tower went up. Before the tower, the farm’s owner”….”never experienced problems. “ “When that tower went up, he ended up losing his animals little by little,” … “While domestic birds sang and a rooster crowed in the background”….a litany of deaths on the farm…”a dog staggering around and then keeling over, and ….a goat suddenly dying from a seizure. Four years ago, a horse fell over on its side, never to recover.” “How many animals have died?” “You couldn’t count them,”….”Over the winter, …a large truck box with the bodies of rabbits and birds.” “It’s the latter that’s attracted the attention of the province’s Natural Resources Department. Upon hearing of robins, finches and other song birds dying at the property, department officials requested that the farm owner send an animal for testing to the Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown.” “College vets will conduct tests on a guinea pig that died at the farm, but it could be weeks before they have answers.” from http://hfxnews.ca/

Posted by: jane Location: buchanan on Aug 19, 2008 at 01:36 PM
So if all these hundreds of cats are unadoptable because of....DISEASE...aren't they supposed to be incinerated?

Posted by: animal lover Location: south bend on Aug 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM
to Jane in Buchanan......you need to contact the local newspaper, and the County Commissioner's office about what you witnessed. Dr. Ecker states that she can't stand to euthanize animals and that's why she has them stacked up in the humane society, then goes behind everyone's back and does something like this. It's no wonder no one believes her. She must spend hours coming up with ways to lie and cheat her way through life.

Posted by: jane Location: buchanan on Aug 19, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Okay so I'm Dr. Ecker and I get busted for dumping hundreds of dead cats and my reply is...THEY WERE ALL UNADOPTABLE..I don't believe that all these animals were sickly, if they were it was because you housed them in small carriers where they ate and defficated in the same place. What are the guidelines that makes an animal unadoptable?? Not cute enough for your liking? Or as with anything else..you just make up the rules as you go along??

Posted by: Genie on Aug 19, 2008 at 12:47 PM
At&t would pay a monthly rental fee for the property. In some cases they may pay a yearly rental fee all at one time in a lump sum. I'm not sure what the actual numbers are but it can range from the 10's of thousands to 100's of thousands of dollars. There was a cell site on a hotel in downtown Indy that was making roughly $150,000 a month for having a site on it's roof. You would figure at the humane society it could be around $50,000 to $75,000 a month.

Posted by: jane Location: buchanan on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:17 AM
Dr Ecker is a lier, those cats did not go to other pet refuges or animal shelters, she is asking for money saying that she runs a no kill shelter that is a lie..I swear on my life that this is what I saw Today at 7:15 am at the Berrian County Landfill. We backed in on the first left curve next to the ST. Joesph Humane Society Van # 434 lic plate # 88613, were upon witnessing 2 men dumping 4 55 gal. trash containers full of dead cats, not to mention the long haired black/tan German Shepard. I couldn't tell you how many cats there were because they were molded into the form of the containers with a few dropping off now and then. So someone tell me, did those 32 dogs they took from that mans garage actually get adopted? and Dr Ecker please tell me... how many dead cats does it take to fill a 55 gallon trash container? I wished I had a camera at the time so I could share the image that will be imbedded in my mind forever.

Posted by: Genie Location: mishawaka on Aug 18, 2008 at 06:08 PM
Exactly how would the Humane Society make the money from this tower? Do they get paid monthly for having it on their property? Also I've heard that once you have a tower on your property you can "rent" service to others....is that the way they plan to get extra income? I Dr. Ecker says she's had to "squish" her plans from a 5 million doller shelter to a 2 million shelter. So what's the problem...last we all heard she already has the 2 mil. She acts like because she can't spend as much money, now she needs to make more money. Hmmm...I don't get it!!

Posted by: Joe on Aug 18, 2008 at 12:28 PM
??.. I'm sure that we could debate this over and over. I'm stating the things that I have seen working with Cell Towers. There are 100's of towers in and around Indianapolis. If they have caused so many problems then why haven't more people complained about them? All of the tower sites I have been to have been cement bases with gravel covering the cement. The only thing that I have seen in the ground that could hurt anything would be the copper for the lightening that strikes the towers to travel down and be grounded. This is no different than if someone has a lightening rod on the roof of their house. With this situation like all others in which towers are involved they would/will check the radiation and have systems to alert the proper people/persons if the radiation levels reach levels too high for life. Each tower has these systems (at least the ones we have put up did). The towers are just as safe as your car. Nothing is 100% safe but they have reasonable safety records

Posted by: ?? Location: St. Joe County on Aug 15, 2008 at 08:07 PM
Joe- Cell Towers also destroy the land and soil it sits on, it depleats the soil of all it's important nutrients. I'm happy to hear your little boxer girl is in good health, I just feel that there are too many unanswered health issue questions regarding cell towers and Animals/Humans who live within close proximity of it. Also, I've heard that the base of the towers are quite big, if the Humane Society plans on building a bigger facility at their Grape Rd location, I just don't see how they can accomplish this with a cell tower stuck on their already small property, not to mention the radio tower which is already present there. Plus, there are homes neighboring the shelter, if I lived there I certainly wouldn't want the tower built, not just because it's an ugly view but because of the radiation and health concerns surrounding it. Not all of us own radiation protective gear. If you think the radiation stays up in the air, why does it damage the soil at the base?

Posted by: Joe on Aug 15, 2008 at 01:31 PM
?? No, my boxer is fancy fawn and in very good health. She is almost 4 years old and I have lived in the same spot for the last 3 years. The only wildlife I saw that had been killed b/c of a cell tower were some mice and a few birds but that's b/c they flew/climbed into the air conditioning units and chewed into wires or hit a spinning fan blade. When I would climb the towers we would have radiation protection gear including a device that would tell us specific levels of radiation. We wouldn't climb the tower if it was above 60. We only ran into 1 tower like that in the over 500 towers we climbed last year.

Posted by: sandy Location: david city on Aug 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Let the Humane Society put up the cell tower. We adopted a dog from there and she is so good. Any thing that will bring help to these homeless animals is commendable.

Posted by: to Todd Location: South Bend on Aug 13 Location: South Bend on Aug 14, 2008 at 07:47 PM
actually, the back-yerd is surrounded by resisidential properties. I see them all the time when i take the dogs out in their play-pens/ run areas in the HS's back yard. and they say in the article they want this thing to go up "on their property on Grape Rd" building, so it sure sounds like it is the current location--the one with the residential home in the backyard.

Posted by: ?? Location: St. Joe County on Aug 14, 2008 at 06:13 PM
Joe- Is your Boxer white?... There has been multiple articles researching the use of Cell Towers and Animal health. There has been reports of Cell Towers being put up on farm land, and soon after, there has been a sudden high death toll in the animals. So much so, that the local DNR have been involved as the wildlife who are close by to the farm have also been dying unexpectedly. Also, officials say between 4 and 15 million birds die due to cell towers. Please google and research this issue BEFORE this tower is put up.

Posted by: Joe on Aug 14, 2008 at 04:22 AM
Jake. What high pitch frequency? I live by a cell phone tower (about 100 yards away) and I own a dog (a Boxer)which is bread to be a hearing security dog. The cell tower doesn't bother my dog. The frequencies for AT&T are pretty high and as far as I know can't even be heard by dogs. Guessing around 900mhz to 1300mhz. At least that's what it said on their equipment when I would work on it.

Posted by: - Location: SB on Aug 13, 2008 at 09:31 PM
They do make them look like trees. There is one near Adams & Hickory. Why doesn't this country use satellite like Europe does?

Posted by: Jake Location: Granger on Aug 13, 2008 at 07:27 PM
All I have to say is that the extra money that comes from building a cell tower will just go directly into Eckers pocket. Also, the high pitched frequencies given off by a cell tower will drive all of those animals crazy. Obviously Dr. Ecker it's not all about the animals, its all about a dime in your pocket.

Posted by: ED Location: SOUTH BEND on Aug 13, 2008 at 04:08 PM
GO FOR IT . THAT EXTRA REVENUE WILL HELP WITH THEIR UTILITIES AND OTHER EXPENSES. SINCE THE COMMUNITY IS NOT SUPPORTING IT THEN IF SOMEONE OFFERS THEM SOME EXTRA INCOME THEY WOULD BE CRAZY NOT TO ACCEPT THE OFFER

Posted by: Treeman on Aug 13, 2008 at 03:47 PM
They should make cell phone towers that look like trees. problem solved.

Posted by: Todd Location: South Bend on Aug 13, 2008 at 03:16 PM
This would be built on their new property..not the current. I believe the only neighbors that I have seen at the current property are a few small businesses back there.

Posted by: karen Location: clay twp on Aug 13, 2008 at 03:11 PM
thank goodness something is finally going the humane society way make it look like a flag pole like at up mall everyone complains about how bad it is there but somebody has finally stepped up to help the animals thank you att for thinking of this money maker for the animals and this helps get the shelters new home built faster here's a thought half of all the money from the cell tower goes directly into the building fund.

Posted by: lj Location: indiana on Aug 13, 2008 at 02:30 PM
Neighbors just get over it!!I think anything to help the thousands of needy animals should be welcomed. I honestly doubt it will have any impact on your property values.I hope all is passed and the humane society is able to get the tower!The more animals they can help , the better.

Posted by: Joe on Aug 13, 2008 at 02:02 PM
Susan. The radiation that is given off from those towers isn't enough to harm you. Besides it's 150 ft in the air. Unless you are an extremely tall person it wouldn't harm you. I used to climb cell towers and they are a lot safer than you think. There is a company called Perfect Wireless here in Indianapolis that can answer all of your questions on the radiation. They are probably the ones that will build the tower in Mishawaka.

Posted by: Rob Location: South Bend on Aug 13, 2008 at 12:37 PM
I'd be pretty happy about this. Full bars in my house all the time? You guys can put one up in my yard!

Posted by: Elkhart Location: Elkhart on Aug 13, 2008 at 11:37 AM
Whats the problemo with a cell phone tower. I mean, hasnt anyone ever seen those massive scary-looking nightmare-inducing ELECTRIC towers dotting the landscape for the last, oh 100 years?

Posted by: wild bil Location: mishawaka on Aug 13, 2008 at 08:50 AM
Ben, I can tell you this, you are not the one to take on that task.

Posted by: M Location: V on Aug 13, 2008 at 07:56 AM
The problem here is agreeing that it costs $2-$5 million to build a humane society...and I didn't know there are sequoias in Indiana.

Posted by: Dave Location: Elkhart on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:48 PM
Get with some local fire departments im sure they would do it and sure could use the extra money!

Posted by: Joe on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:18 PM
I don't see why people are getting up in arms about this. They could do a stealth tower also known as a Flag Pole Tower at the site and people wouldn't even know it was a tower. I believe they used this same type of tower at University Park Mall not too long ago. All the tower would look like is a very large flag pole with a flag hanging from it with all of the antennas, coax cables being concealled in the tower. What harm is it if the Humane society gets some extra money that the public isn't donating? It makes no sense and could be used as a patriotic gesture along with providing better cell phone coverage for the area.

Posted by: Robert Location: Mishawaka on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:00 PM
Sounds like a great idea! They have my vote.

Posted by: steve Location: mishawaka on Aug 12, 2008 at 09:54 PM
More Revenue for what? The SJCHS is useless. They are not there to help the public but to make money anyway they can. I had to take a dog to the Elkhart Humane Society and beg them to take this dog that obviously needed to be put down, but the SJCHS refused to do anything to help. They even lied to the Elkhart Humane Society when they called to ask them about their procedures.

Posted by: Ben Location: Nappanee on Aug 12, 2008 at 09:50 PM
All these neighbors need to shut up. It's not damaging your property. Whoop-de-doo there's a tower you can see. What makes it difference than a power line? You all need to be taken out back and beaten.

Posted by: John T. Location: South Bend on Aug 12, 2008 at 08:58 PM
First them, then the guy down the street and everyone else who needs a dime. I would vote "NO" The area is so clystered with billboards and other junk. Need to live with in a budget and just do it.

Posted by: Susan Location: Mishawaka on Aug 12, 2008 at 08:45 PM
Wow. The Humane Society has some nerve. They are already the worst neighbor ever--with the noise, the smell, and the trash they allow to accumulate on their property (then blow into the neighbors' yards), now they want to add radiation. Sometimes I can't believe the nerve in people.

Posted by: Mary on Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38 PM
Sounds like they have no real plans on moving does it?

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 12, 2008 at 07:27 PM
The glorious of city of Mishawaka wants that Indy Carmel look and feel. They hate automotive repair facilities, car lots and such, why the heck would they allow the tower? That would be one ugly eye sore for the Humane Society Neighbors. I love animals and say euthanize them if you can't afford to house them. Sell them to China as meat--who cares. If your council approves this someone is getting a kick back and they should all be voted out of office.


Five Day
WNDU News Poll
There are currently no active polls at this time.
Click here to view other polls on our site and past poll results.
MichianaGuide.com