School Board Report Card -- Part 2
School Board Report Card -- Part 2 Save Email Print
South Bend, IN
Posted: 12:22 AM Jul 10, 2008
Last Updated: 9:06 AM Jul 10, 2008
Reporter: Erin Logan
Email Address: erin.logan@wndu.com

A | A | A

In a unanimous vote, he was chosen to lead the South Bend School Corporation and before he knew it, he was shown the door.

Dr. Robert Zimmerman was superintendent for less than two years before he was ousted.

Since then, the school board has gotten a lot of attention. They say for the most part, it has been negative attention.

In part two of our series, "School Board Report Card," longtime board members explain what went wrong.


With multiple people making decisions on how to best set children up for success, one body must be the commander.

South Bend School Board President Sheila Bergeron says, “The superintendent is certainly the leader of the corporation.”

Bergeron says in her first year as President, she has felt she and other board members had to take charge, but not by choice.

She says, “If we don't know what's going on it makes it very difficult and very frustrating.”

As Dr. Robert Zimmerman himself told us, it was highlighted in his evaluation that some of the board members simply did not agree with his communication style.

Bergeron and long-time board members Marcia Hummel and Ralph Pieniazkiewicz say when communication breaks down a disaster is inevitable.

Hummel says, “When the superintendent fails to manage, the board steps into a micromanagement role.”

Pieniazkiewicz says, “We just hit a snag, that's all I can tell you. From 2000 to 2006, I think we made some tremendous strides.”

Each of these three members has been on the board a minimum of ten years. They say, unfortunately, the focus has drifted a bit from the children because their leader was out of touch.

Hummel says, “It's just been these last couple of years.”

So what was it that attracted them to Zimmerman in the first place?

After working with other leaders, they say he had the one key component the others were missing. He believed in spending more time in the schools than at his desk. They say once hired, he did deliver in that area, but he lacked the bottom line: an open line of communication they respected from the previous superintendent Dr. Joan Raymond.

Bill Sniadecki, a strong Zimmerman supporter says Zimmerman had it, but the board failed to see it. He feels Zimmerman was doomed to failure from day one because of Dr. Raymond's popularity among this group and even across the nation.

Members do not seem to argue this point.

Hummel says, “The superintendent has to be a strong individual leader and can pull the board together and reason with the board on decisions or at least explain them so the board understands.”

Hummel, Bergeron, and Pieniazkiewicz admit there was a point in time before Zimmerman was even hired, that the board as a whole failed.

Bergeron says, “We just did a limited Indiana search and I kind of wish we had done a national search. There was disagreement about that on the board. People didn't want to do that because it cost too much money.”

Looking back, Bergeron says it would have been time and money well spent.

She says, “The board has gotten a lot of criticism lately.”

One criticism, they took to heart is a letter written to the local paper by former board member, Dr. Richard Sheehan, which is titled, “Leadership and the Lack Thereof.”

Sheehan talks about several parties being to blame for the board's reputation, the board itself to an extent and the community being misinformed by the paper.

Bergeron says, “We can not discuss someone's evaluation or weaknesses or concerns we have because they are an employee.”

Sheehan's letter claims unfortunately, a board member released that information.

The board says instead of finger pointing, it is time to move forward.

Zimmerman is gone, Interim Superintendent Jim Kapsa is in place and they plan to do an extensive search this time around.

Pieniazkiewicz says, “The better the community can accept us and back us, it's going to be that much better for the kids.”

Hummel says, “We need to have the best and most qualified superintendent.”

Bergeron says they board is still in healing mode, but she has already seen improvements since Kapsa has been in place.


In part three of our “School Board Report Card” series, we will hear from Richard Sheehan about his letter and what he believes makes up a successful school board.

A local education professor who's studied education for over 40 years also shares her thoughts.

Related Stories
School Board Report Card -- Part 1

More Stories
ATF agents raid the Warsaw home of a known white supremacist

Granger man turns hobby into business with D'Avella Family Winery

Update: Woman and children recovering after car crashes into store window

U93 kicks off annual Roofsit campaign to help prevent child abuse

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Brad Location: Niles on Jul 13, 2008 at 12:01 AM
SBCSC Teacher: Excellent response. Talk about hitting the nail on the head!

Posted by: sbcsc teacher Location: sbcsc on Jul 10, 2008 at 11:41 PM
To Mary continue to laugh at all the remarks regarding Dr. Zimmerman not being allowed to do his job. You would laugh because you are a part of what is wrong with sbcsc, too many nay sayers in key positions and not enough people in the trenches. I am not advocating for or against Zimmerman but anyone with any semblance of sense knows this man did not change from what they hired in this short time. He is who he is and the board is who they are. We need to go to a appointed board, that is diverse, knowledgeable about educational trends, honest, respectful and bring expertise to the job. Not one board member presently has brought any of these qualities to our board. Where is the mayor? Face it this board is not capable of taking us forward. Dr. Raymond is the measurement and what she did was develop and impplement programs for the capable but nothing for the disenfranchised. Implementation of programs for this group were disolved. No alternative schools in an urban district.

Posted by: Dave Location: South Bend on Jul 10, 2008 at 09:11 PM
I just have a few questions for the School Board. I would also like to note that since the South Bend Coummnity School Corporation is over 20 million dollars in debt my first question will be; Where did you find the money to buy out Dr. Zimmerman's contract? Number 2 Where are you going to find the money to find a new superintendant? Number 3 Where are you going to find the money to pay said new superintendant and pay for a new contract with the teachers since that is not settled yet.

Posted by: Mary /Teacher on Jul 10, 2008 at 06:07 PM
I laugh at all the comments that say the Board did not let Zimmerman work on his goals. What goals? The man did not have one goal. What did he do in two years to earn his salary? Nothing!!! The only mistake the Board made was hiring him in the first place and being bullied by the NEA and Tribune to keep this do-nothing in ghost employment. Good riddance and congratulations to the five brave Board members who had the guts to get rid of dead wood.

Posted by: Gracie Location: South Bend on Jul 10, 2008 at 01:58 PM
One of the better things Dr. Z accomplished was to go out into the schools, speak with the students and listen to the teachers. The Board did try to micro manage him as I sat in enough of the School Board meetings and watched them frustrate the man and his goals. South Bend needs to realize a number of issues are causing the poor academic performance: the incredibly high rate of illegitimate births in the community and the lack of a family structure to raise children in a stable enviornment. This is at the top of my list. Next is to stop the practise of social promotion and wait until a student reaches high school before work is actually, consistantly expected of him. This is utter nonsense, with no work ethic or expectations these students are doomed to failure. The third issue is for the teachers to teach and not do social work. Fourth: There is a desperate need for Voc Ed and alternative schools. And lastly, go back to neighborhood schools and stop this crazy bussing.

Posted by: F- for the board on Jul 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM
I give the board members a F-. Look at the how long most of the board memebers have hel office, 10 years, in 10 years have we seen a improvement?

Posted by: Concerned Location: SBCSC on Jul 10, 2008 at 12:24 PM
In reference to Sheehan's letter, he is not a model board member being that he too had personal agendas. I remember his reign there were issues, they did have the savvy to maintain their status. When the board makes a decision such as they have to buy out a contract of a superintendent with tax payers money the tax payers have a right to KNOW the issues. I do not buy personnel concerns. There needs to be parameters for a measure as severe and costly as this. Hummel if I remember correctly was president during Raymonds' tenure and is responsible for the hiring of Zimmerman. If I remember correctly she was in charge of the search for superintendent after Raymond annouced her resignation. I too realize that Raymond did not want to go through with it therefore certain manipulations were in place however did not pan out.Robert Zimmerman is the same man the board hired under the leadership of Hummel(not Jones) what changed? Sheehan nice try to bail out your buddies!!

Posted by: Anonymous teacher on Jul 10, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Why are we wasting time on Dr. Zimmerman and the board when the teachers still do not have a contract. The buyout should have gone to teachers!! We have not had a raise of more than 1% for years...

Posted by: Female Location: SBSCS on Jul 10, 2008 at 12:04 PM
I am not aware of the leadership demonstrated by Hojnacki, but Hummel certainly isn't a prime example of leadership. If this is the best you can do no wonder you are in the situation you are in. This current board is a disgrace to the community as a whole. I applaud the teachers in this corporation because this last antic is a slap in their faces. I feel there is no rationale for this buy out other than this was the plan in the beginning. If you think back Raymond resigned but sat in the seat until October 1, did not allow the man a office in the corporation building because you couldn't have 2 supers and she still had her ax to grind. The one thing I will say is she had the board in control because they were afraid to cross her. She did have some definite concerns, DUIs? but were they address NO, because birds of similar flocks stick together. I feel sorry for the children of SBCSC. The board should do a favor to all and resign. You 5 know who you are.

Posted by: Jeff Location: South Bend on Jul 10, 2008 at 11:57 AM
Why don't we elect a superintendent just like we elect the school board members? There could be some minimum requirements so that not just anyone could run for superintendent. This would provide checks and balances between these two branches of the local government. This is why we elect the Congress, Senate, and the President separately. I think most of the current school board members are arrogant and they want a superintendent that they can control, i.e., a puppet regime. Luckily for them, they can manipulate the current system to achieve this. They say it is in the best interest of the students, but they do not show anything to substantiate this claim.

Posted by: CB Location: South Bend on Jul 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM
In this article, the board states, "the focus has drifted a bit from the children because their leader was out of touch"--their leader was in the schools, working with administrators, observing teachers in their classroom, talking with students--he was way more 'in touch' with those that are working in the schools (aka NOT the board!). Perhaps if some board members could realize decision making needs to come from being informed not merely sitting behind a table this whole education mess would be moving forward instead of stalled dead in the water. The news story shed light on the board--their report card reads more like a resume--it's sad that these people have had so much power for so long! Hopefully things will start to move in a more positive direction soon--our children deserve the best education possible, not more bickering and finger pointing.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Why don't we give the school board an ultimatum? Either the ISTEP scores for seniors are over 70% passing for both math and english, or all of you resign.

Posted by: Mae Location: South Bend on Jul 10, 2008 at 10:42 AM
The entire educational system is broken and not just in South Bend. Why are boards forced to give 3 yr. contracts to superintendents? So that when things go bad, they still get paid? Why are superintendents allowed to remove qualified, trained staff? So that they can create a "good ole boy" club who are nothing but "yes" men? Why do teachers have unions? Do other professionals--doctors, lawyers--need them? Why is teacher seniority considered more important and qualifications? Much was accomplished between 2000-06 (Ralph P.)which included curriculum written to match state standards, magnet schools, increased student enrollment, Kennedy/LaSalle academies, renovated buildings, redistricting, school choice etc. Sheehan, Hojnacki and Hummel were there. Maybe we should just allow the teacher's union and next superintendent to pick the board members and then there will be no future problems. The community would also have no voice.

Posted by: John Location: Indiana on Jul 10, 2008 at 10:36 AM
Having worked in education for a number of years, the biggest problem is people who think they know best and they have never been in a classroom or haven't been in a classroom since the 70's. Education has changed, but school boards and so-called experts that come up with all of these hair-brained ideas of how kids should be taught out so far out of touch, it does nothing but hurt the students and educators. Here in South Bend, the board members need to voted out, period!

Posted by: Carol Location: South Bend on Jul 10, 2008 at 09:59 AM
I'm so furious with this board I wish I could fire them all, immediately. Dr. Raymond had the gift of gab, Dr. Zimmerman has the gift of improving students' educational environment. This ineffective board cannot do the job they said they could, let's get rid of them. IN needs the recall option. Pieniazkiewicz says for us to just accept and back this inefficient board the better it would be for the kids. He is wrong. Supporting inefficient employees does not improve the workplace. My message to the board is, do us all a favor and resign now! We'll find replacements for you.

Posted by: ben Location: writing 101 on Jul 10, 2008 at 08:23 AM
I thought an elementary process of writing was to state examples that support a statement; Hence; However, South Bend has an additional problem involving a general lack of leadership. William Hojnacki and Marcia Hummel are among the few who have stepped up and tried to provide some leadership and direction. Examples of direction and leadership.......

Posted by: Brad Location: Niles on Jul 10, 2008 at 08:12 AM
The only reason they make policies that do not allow the disclosure of such information is because more than likely Zimmerman did not violate any policy so the board results to using blanketed descriptions (failure to communicate) as if they did it would be quickly found out they in fact had no basis for the dismissal. It is more likely that the dismissal was based on personal feelings and opinion. This is one of the many reasons are schools are in the gutter. Decision's are no longer based on the good of the children, community and education.

Posted by: Mary Location: South Bend on Jul 10, 2008 at 07:46 AM
Erin Logan did a very good job on this report. Dr. Sheehan's letter is one of the best I have ever read and is exactly what is going on. I so wish he was still on the School Board. Instead, the Community went from one of the most intelligent Board Members ever to serve to his replacement, Sniadecki, one of the worse. I too, blame the Tribune's Editorial Board and the NEA leadership for most of the bad publicity.

Posted by: Riley Mom on Jul 10, 2008 at 07:41 AM
First the writer of this story has no clue about a report card. A report card is an evaluation of ones performance. What I read is more like a resume and cover letter I would throw away. The school board is the main problem. They, Hummel and crew need to learn what real leadership is, rather than trying to micromanage the Supt. Get rid of all these people and start over. None are team players, all have hidden agendas and Hummel loves her picture in the paper each time she opens her mouth. Ever try to speak at one of these meetings? A time limit is set to hear an issue of three minutes and the bell dings and that's it. Well Damn it ding the bell South Bend Residents and get rid of this group of fighting, pathetic people that don't get anything accomplished for our kids. The a@@ kissing days of Joan Raymond are gone and this board needs to be gone as well.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2008 at 07:23 AM
This is a failed Beauracracy. The board members should all be ashamed, instead of pointing the finger at anyone else.

Posted by: mike Location: south bend on Jul 10, 2008 at 07:22 AM
OK Sheehan what exactly did you do for our children. Specifics please. WNDU how about a little follow up to the Sheehan years.

Posted by: Douglas Location: Sapporo, Japan on Jul 10, 2008 at 05:04 AM
As a graduate of John Adams High School, I must say that this news disgusts me. I am not, however, surprised. I find it simply miraculous that there has been little or nothing mentioned of the fact that the contract of Dr. Zimmerman has yet to be completed, and that the corporation (i.e. the taxpayers) will be forced to pay Dr. Zimmerman the remainder of his contract amount regardless of whether or not he continues his work. I know there were both internal and external complaints regarding Dr. Joan Raymond (I certainly heard much of it while at Adams), but at the same time there was also an equally large faction who agreed with her methodology. I, however, as well as many of my friends who were also students at the time, simply did not know what to think because the board was and still is so out of touch with the students themselves. Firing Dr. Zimmerman will do nothing to solve this inherent problem and will add to the already large debt the corp. already holds. For shame.


Five Day
WNDU News Poll
There are currently no active polls at this time.
Click here to view other polls on our site and past poll results.
MichianaGuide.com