Who's watching the animals? How other cities do it
Who's watching the animals? How other cities do it Save Email Print
Posted: 10:30 PM Jun 6, 2008
Last Updated: 11:35 PM Jun 6, 2008
Reporter: Ryan Famuliner
Email Address: ryan.famuliner@wndu.com

A | A | A

After the first two installments of "Who's watching the animals?" we spoke with St. Joseph County Humane Society board members, who said they wished we would've compared them with a facility closer to their size or larger, suggesting Fort Wayne or Indianapolis.

We decided to try to do that, but found out there's more contrasting to be done than comparing when it comes to humane societies, in general.

The St. Joseph County Humane Society is a non-profit organization, but does animal control work for both the city of Mishawaka and the county, through contracts.

But it's hard to find someone just like them, because there's really no by-the-book way to run a humane society.

For instance, in Fort Wayne the humane society also does animal control, but is completely funded by the city. With that steady funding they're able to pay employees more, and afford regular improvements to their facilities.

In Evansville, the humane society is a non-profit that also takes in strays, but doesn't handle animal control: a city-run organization does.

That makes it easier for them to know what to expect each day, while literally anything could come through St. Joe County’s door.

Indianapolis also has a different system in place, and we decided to make a visit there to see what we might be able to learn from their experiences.

The Humane Society of Indianapolis is also a non-profit, but doesn't handle any animal control services.

“We don’t have a contract right now, but when the humane society bought this property in 1967, we actually had a contract with the city, and for many years we were the sheltering and adoption resource for the city,” said humane society C.E.O. Martha Boden.

Boden says that contract for sheltering ended in the late 80's, and Indianapolis animal care and control were left on their own.

However, the two entities continue to work together regularly - the humane society takes in animals from many shelters in the region to be adopted out.

“I think in every community they just have to find the best fit for themselves, and I think right now our cooperative effort of having the animals come in here, and then funnel them back out for adoption at the humane society seems to be working right now,” said Kristeen Vantwoud, Kennel Manager at Animal Care and Control of Indianapolis.

While that type of change is drastic, and can be a huge investment for the city involved, Boden says sometimes it just happens to be the best option.
“It really depends on the community and what causes the relationship to change. In our case I think when our two organizations realized we were going to have 2 facilities, it just made sense for the city to consolidate and bring the animals to their own place,” Boden said.

Animal Care and Control of Indianapolis has more in common with St. Joseph County’s humane society than Boden’s organization does, because AC&C also has to take in whatever comes through their door. But still, they’re not operating on the same level entirely, since AC&C is funded by the city.

AC&C says they handle about 18,000 animals every year, and are around capacity most of the year, which is 450 animals.

If you want to compare that to St. Joe County, they take in about 8,000 a year, and they are currently holding more than 500 animals. Their ideal capacity is about 300.

Vantwoud says they've never really even neared double capacity.

“We're always running at capacity which makes everybody constantly scrambling to find the next home or the next foster, but yeah, not that bad,” Vantwoud said.

Never bad enough to need to use cat carriers for temporary storage like St. Joe County, who says some animals will stay in them 2-3 days on average while being processed.

But, it is considered an option at AC&C if they're in an overcrowding emergency.

“We've got a place that we could stack crates and keep animals. We haven’t had to resort to that, again we're fortunate to have enough space,” Vantwoud said.

But they say the way they plan for and avoid overcrowding, is by working with whatever agencies will answer their calls.

“You have to take help from wherever you can get it, and we're just grateful we work with many many many, over 100, rescue facilities that are here every day every week pulling animals,” Vantwoud said.

“We tend to get a little insular because it’s just such a demanding job, and you do have to step back and say wait a second do I have to do this by myself? Who could help me? Who do I even know who could help me?” Boden said.

The Humane Society of Indianapolis is one of those options for St. Joseph County. In fact, for the first time in Boden’s memory, Indianapolis took in a shipment of cats from St. Joseph last week.

Boden says being open to making changes is important, but also can be difficult.

“It really does take a certain amount of stepping back from that kind of day to day reactive mode and really saying what do we think is going to make a difference, and what do we know is going to make a difference,” Boden said.

“Every community is different. Every community is unique and the kind of solutions that may work in Louisville may not work in Indianapolis, and those might not work in Minneapolis, but they’re going to work in Milwaukee. So really understanding who supports your animal shelter, and who's going to help, and who's going to be interested in how you carry out your mission is an important part to making those decisions,” Boden said.

The Humane Society of Indianapolis says turnover is also a problem for them, as it is at St. Joseph.

Meanwhile, AC&C of Indianapolis says they are able to keep employees longer, since they're funded by the city, and the workers are unionized.

Both the shelters in Indianapolis use euthanasia openly, as do the shelters in Fort Wayne and Evansville.

Meanwhile, St. Joe County makes a point to avoid using it on adoptable animals.

Both Boden and Vantwoud also echoed what we've been hearing all along, that spaying and neutering are major solutions.

At the Humane Society of Indianapolis, they actually perform the operations on their animals on-site.

Meanwhile, AC&C offers them free to some clients, but not on their own accord. They line clients up with other programs in the community that offer those services.

Both also echoed the fact that adopting from shelters is key, but stressed it's important that the shelters themselves make it affordable and attractive to the community.

They hope the shelter is the first place people think to go looking for a new pet.

“Somewhere between I think it's 15% and maybe 20% of all new pets going into homes come from shelters, so if we could get that up to 25% or 30%, we could probably empty out most of the shelters in this county, its that simple,” Boden said.

“Shelters really do themselves a disservice by kind of skimping on those budgets and not really getting their names out there, and getting people to think to come here rather than going to a pet store or an ad in the newspaper or something along those lines,” Vantwoud said.

The Humane Society of Indianapolis says they do all they can to avoid adopted animals being returned to the facility, because that's very inefficient. At the same time, they try to make adoption easier for clients. For example, they don't require references for potential adoptions, however they do require information from a landlord to know if an animal is even allowed in the client's place of residence.

The city of South Bend started its own animal control program 11 years ago.

They're currently working on plans to build a new facility in Kennedy Park that would quadruple their size, for a price of between $1.5 million and $1.9 million.

Related Stories
Who's Watching the Animals? Part 1

Who's watching the animals? Part 2

Local leaders weigh in on "Who's watching the animals?"

A dog-day at the St. Joseph County Humane Society

Taking on the spay/neuter problem

County leaders tour St. Joseph County Humane Society

More Stories
ATF agents raid the Warsaw home of a known white supremacist

Granger man turns hobby into business with D'Avella Family Winery

Update: Woman and children recovering after car crashes into store window

U93 kicks off annual Roofsit campaign to help prevent child abuse

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Jay Location: Granger on Jul 2, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Sound Familiar:Aniaml Hoarding as defined by Humane Society of the United States: Hoarding describes the situations in which individuals have unusually large numbers of animals and cannot provide minimal standards of care.In nearly all cases animals are found dead or in extremely poor health. Hoarders often deny that they cannot care for these animals and do not acknowledge the impact of their actions on the animals or human members of the household. The behavior has serious health implications, including the spread of zoonotic diseases. many, if not most hoarding cases involve high levels of environmental ammonia. Public health hazards, combined with animal welfare issues can escalate a hoarding case into a disaster.

Posted by: To Red Eye on Jun 30, 2008 at 10:59 AM
It was South Bend Animal Control that confiscated those dogs, different shelter, different city. SJCHS wouldn't be able to house all those dogs at the same time. However, I was wondering what had happened regarding the hoarding problem at the Humane Society? This story went from exposing them, to the over population problem to Ryan working there for a day to "How other shelters do it"... I'm confused?? What happened to the original problem? Has it been overlooked and forgotton? The hidden camera article was the real deal, it was the horrible truth!! But I just don't get how it's been put on the back burner while other animal stories have now dominated the news. WNDU is there an update on the original story and concerns?

Posted by: Red Eye Location: Niles on Jun 26, 2008 at 07:24 PM
Who's Watching The Animals" now WNDU ? Once again they "confiscated" 20 more dogs..That were in a garage in cages, BUT with food and water and not in any immediate danger. Are they stolen? IS the property owner a "hoarder" Why didnt they take pictures, approach the owner, and the prosecutor FIRST? I'm suspecting these dogs are NO better off tonight , then they were Tuesday night in the garage. There seems to be a possibility that the St. Joe Co. Humane Society Director is actually also an "Animal Hoarder". "The individual may derive pride in his/her role as a “savior” and caregiver of these animals and strongly assertethical and moral objections to the potential for animal homelessness or euthanasia. There may be physical, emotional, and/or cognitive impairments which affect the animal hoarder’s capacity to insightfully acknowledge that the conditions for the humans and/or animals are problematic" -- Jane N. Nathanson and the Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium June 6, 2002

Posted by: no no on Jun 24, 2008 at 07:22 PM
Looks like this stoy is going to fall off the bottom of the web page. WNDU probably got told to shut up/paid off by some rich ass.

Posted by: no name Location: south bend on Jun 22, 2008 at 11:46 PM
yeah... what happened? WNDU more stories/ updates, please. Let us know that the over-crowding/ hoarding situation is being taken seriously or--hopefully--solved!

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2008 at 05:56 PM
So what happened? Did anything change?Or is this going to get swept under the rug?

Posted by: Past Employee Location: Neverland on Jun 12, 2008 at 09:30 AM
"What goes on in the back stays in the back!" The women is a liar, and on tv to boot! Spare no sympathy for she was a bully to employees and customers alike. Ask her about operating without the animal being fully under,thats right still awake. Ask her about the smell from the agulizer, the trail of feces thru the building to the dumpster. The cat cages covered in feces, blood, urine. How about cats giving birth overnight and kittens still hanging out of the mother cat who is covered in litter and blood. Ask her about injured dogs having to wait three days for any kind of treatment,she is inhumane. The list goes on and on. That facility should be throughly investigated by someone who can do something. What is wrong here? Your investigation did nothing,as long as she is there this mismanagement will continue. Take her license away. Her comment on past employees not be team players is b.s. Ask her about her treatment of cats with ear mites. God forgive me for not doing anything.

Posted by: The BEST Location: South Bend on Jun 9, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Check out Atlanta Pet Rescue (http://www.atlantapetrescue.org/www_ver2/). They sell the animals by advertising what they have and then ensuring they go to good homes by the follow-up pictures. They get funding/donations for their animals that are in need. I often donate money to this group. Maybe if the shelters here did the same thing Atlanta Pet Rescue does there wouldn't be a problem HERE. Atlanta Pet Rescue finds homes for THOUSANDS of animals each year.

Posted by: ELLEN white Location: SOUTH BEND on Jun 9, 2008 at 12:20 PM
A great solution to the problem maybe right under our nose, why not have people in our prisons/jails help train dogs for the blind? Prisoners can go through training and they in turn can train the dogs, so they are not put to sleep, it;s not fair to the animal to be put to sleep nor live in a cage the rest of it's life. i'm sure seeing eye dogs are quite costly however if our society that is locked up train them that would hold down cost as well as spare the dog's life.

Posted by: PAST EMPLOYEE on Jun 8, 2008 at 01:26 PM
"No Kill" is certainly something to strive towards, but this needs time and plenty of work (especially with the community) to work. The current situation at SJCHS is not a good one, it's not good for animals to be piled up on top of one another in this way, the shelter is old, there is NO airflow, there is no air conditioning and the building actually sweats! The condensation collects on the ceiling and drips down the walls. Moisture is always present in the summer months. The animals get too hot, there's no way to cool them. The disease is rampant. Operating "no Kill" is not the right solution right now, maybe in a new bigger building with airflow. I've worked there during this hoarding period, the hoarding and conditions was and still is my reason for leaving. Operating "Low Kill" is good in theory, but very bad in reality. I've personally seen a lot of animals die "A slow death" than I ever have done in the past 2 years. It's a horrible situation for the animals.

Posted by: Heather Location: Elkhart on Jun 8, 2008 at 10:47 AM
I agree on the low cost spay/neuter program especially for low income families who would like to have a pet. They also need to implement some sort of Trap, Neuter, Return to help control the stray and feral population. Many people find strays with kittens which they do not want to make pets and do not want to see put down by the shelter, but do not want them reproducing and overridding the entire neighborhood. If there was a place for these people to take these cats which they could afford and then return them to where they found them, I think less would dump these on the shelter and this would help to control the population. Plus, what happens when someone takes these cats to the shelter and then later on wants to adopt a pet? I have heard many stories of people getting denied because they turned a stray into the shelter at some time in the past. The shelter needs to work with the community to reduce the population. After all, cats can reproduce faster than rabbits.

Posted by: Heather Location: Elkhart on Jun 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM
I also think part of the SJCHS problem stems from their new ordinance. They are requiring Vets to report owners who have more than 3 animals causing some owners to try and hide the fact they have more than that number or to lower that number by surrendering them to the shelter causing the shelter to have more. Many of these households can afford and handle more than 3 and would be more than happy to pay a licensing fee for each of their animals but do not feel they should have to pay for a special use permit for a kennel or cattery. It is not uncommon for a household to have 2 dogs and 2 cats which are all licensed, altered, chiped, and have shots. Think of how much extra money the SJCHS could receive if they cracked down on true kennels and catteries and allowed that 4th or 5th pet?

Posted by: To Roger on Jun 8, 2008 at 06:53 AM
A little spellcheck needed on the website, Darlin': businesses, companies, and strictly were a few words I noticed. Are you wanting to provide another animal control facility or a no-kill shelter?? It seems apparent that trying to do both at the same time is almost impossible in the current climate of high intakes and low adoptions. Do you know people who would be interested in running another facility or do you have some kind of business plan? I'm not being sarcastic. I just would be interested to know if this is a real interest in actually opening a new shelter in St. Joe County. I can tell you right now that the 3 already-established entities need new buildings, a ton more volunteers and/or staff, foster homes, and donations. Wouldn't it be more feasible to try to work within the system and make things better for the ones already here? As a community, we should have enough influence to demand any improvements needed at all of the facilities, including replacing a director.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 7, 2008 at 10:35 PM
I agree with Heather, and Anomymous. Compare the St. Joseph County Humane Society and the Elkhart County Humane Society. The difficult part would be to get the management group of the Elkhart Co. facility to actually "comment", as most of them worked for the St. Joseph Co. facility. They are a hard working group that does everything in their power to protect and care for animals. There must be a reason for leaving, and driving from their home county, to a neighboring county.... It would also be interesting to get reasons for other past directors and give their reasons for leaving. St. Joseph County would be a real mess without the hard work and care provided by Pet Refuge, who, the last time I checked, provides adoption at a lower cost and neuters all of the amimals they put out for adoption.... The SJCHS is broken, and is badly in need of repair! Please, Dr. Eckhart, let go, and leave with dignity.. Thank you for all you done over the past several decades.

Posted by: Stephen Location: New Carlisle on Jun 7, 2008 at 10:00 PM
They should change their name.... recently after three days of hearing a soft meow and not being able to find the source my family discovered a kitten had gotten stuck inside a hole in our tree. the hole was at ground level. my wife called the st joe county humane society and told them about the kitten. we were told they do not service us and dont climb trees. we told them it was ground level but they said we had to call the local police and have them call the society. what good are they? st joe county humane society should service st joe county not just select towns. I am thankfull the police did come and rescue this kitten. after this and other experiances it would be a cold day in *&^% before i let them touch one of my animals.

Posted by: Jess Location: Osceola on Jun 7, 2008 at 09:48 PM
I agree with Heather, they should have interviewed Elkhart. The way they operate is very similar and their shelter is very clean. The staff is very nice also. I think they even take in more animals then St. Joe. Why don't you talk to them Ryan?

Posted by: Mark on Jun 7, 2008 at 09:33 PM
The bottom line is a no-kill facility only works in a thriving economic environment where people can actually contemplate the expense of pet ownership. It's a noble idea, but until either A) the elected officials extract their heads from their backsides and work toward making the county economically viable or B) the citizens recognize their ineptitude and replace them, this idea doesn't have a chance. Look, we just got a 40 million dollar bonus from Major Moves. That money went to... well, actually I don't remember seeing a single word in our fine local news about what happened to that money. Anyway, look at the poor puppies. Ignore the very rich people behind the green curtain. And pay your taxes!

Posted by: hmmmm Location: mishawaka on Jun 7, 2008 at 06:50 PM
This is interesting to find out that they make adoption more friendly and more affordable and don't scrutinize like ours does time and time again you here about people being turned away what is to be done. Why at this point has she not been asked to step down, hell I could do just as well running the facility. Lets push forward to improve this facility and the animals lives.

Posted by: Debra Location: Granger on Jun 7, 2008 at 03:08 PM
I'm glad someone is finally looking in to the 'in-Humane Society". We recently had a VERY VERY bad experience with the St. Joseph County center.We had a dog that had gotten out of our yard and had been hit by a car and came in to them on a Sunday afternoon (as a DOA. My husband and I checked every day and were told that there were no dogs fitting her description. He even brought in pictures of her. Finally-When I went in there the third day, I was led back to the 'freezer' area and that's where she had been SINCE SUNDAY. They said that they had a DOA file basket but only certain people were authorized to actually go in to the freezer. I know nothing will bring our Daisy back, BUT I hope your investigation leads to not only better conditions for the animals (which are BADLY needed) but also a change in procedure as to how things are handled. I appreciate the time and effort you are putting in to this story. Hopefully your work will get noticed and will PAY OFF! Thank You!

Posted by: Joe Location: Elkhart on Jun 7, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I really hope that this story encourages the St. Joe HS to rethink their policy re working with other rescues and fosters. I also like Anonymous Jun 6’s suggestion that the animal control contract be given to another entity until the SJCHS finds a way to properly deal with a surplus/ energy influx of animals. And I also like the constructive point that the humane society could take a much more active role in spay ad neuter campaigns. Like, they could go out in the community, advertise more and even run a low cost/ even free spay neuter day for low-income families. Finally, I like the article’s implicit suggestion that the SJCHS really needs to stop sitting on that money. They need to use it to deal with the crisis situation that they are in RIGHT NOW.

Posted by: Todd Location: Mishawaka on Jun 7, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Heather and Anonymous..you both have excellent points. My limited interaction with the Elkhart shelter was very good. It seems to be ran well. I also agree that the contract should be pulled from St Joe County. I don't think we are getting the level of service we should be from them. That is fine if they want to be a no kill shelter...Warsaw is also, but they had the contract pulled as well. I don't think the two work out well together.

Posted by: Robin on Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Bob from granger, the person running the humane society now is new as in the last two years, the person prior to thats name was Eric, and he left to help a facility in a different town. Anoynymous on Jun6,I run a small living community, and cats are dropped off here constantly, the humane society has always repsponded to every call made to them during & after hours, very quickly. I also donate when able and am registered to volunteer my time, what are you doing besides writing about to help the problem.

Posted by: Vi Location: Elkhart on Jun 7, 2008 at 11:03 AM
I think that its much more humane to euthanize the animals than have them packed in crates and sitting in pens and inhumane conditions. it would be much better for them go to "animal heaven" where they can run free. =)

Posted by: Brad Location: Niles on Jun 7, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Heather, Anon and Bob well put. This problem needs to be forced back on track. Heather I can only assume that they did not compare SJCHS to Elkhart as it would have identified and reinforced what everyone has been noting in the previous articles.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 7, 2008 at 10:18 AM
I believe that if the SJHS wants to become a no-kill facility, then they should also work more with rescues where they can help find homes for the dogs and cats that are adoptable. This will help keep them from being hundreds of animals over capacity. What good is it to save animals if they have to live in crates when a perfectly good rescue that has room can take them? I believe that it is time that some new blood and ideas are desperately needed in the top position on the board...

Posted by: Greg Location: Brush on Jun 7, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Actually, the situation in Indianapolis is very poor. Last year only 1/3 of all animals came out of IACC alive and the other 2/3 went out in a garbage truck. While HSI is supposed to be taking animals from IACC for adoption, they often have empty kennels and solicit neighboring humane societies and shelters for adoptable animals, claiming that out of the over 400 animals at IACC at any time, there aren't enough that are "adoptable". HSI also has introduced a very controversial new pricing structure where the "more desirable" animals sell for upwards of $500 a la pet stores. This year alone IACC has killed over 2000 animals (estimated -- the most recent statistics are difficult to obtain). So be careful when citing Indianapolis as an example of anything other than business as usual in the animal sheltering world. Lots of slick talk and MOST of the animals are still dying.

Posted by: Fedup Location: Indianapolis on Jun 7, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Did you realize that Martha Boden of HSI sends strays and rejects to IACC to be euthanized while they pull more 'select' purebreds and highly adoptable animals from other cities? They only deal with the 'cream of the crop' and often have many empty cages and price their animals up to 400 dollars?? Instead of listening to her, please come take a look at this facility. The same for IACC. Their killing rate is approx 90% and rarely do outreach adoption programs. In both facilities the animals they kill aren't 'unadoptable'. Only 9% of the animals could be umbrellaed under that term. Both facilities need new directors and a new life-saving direction.

Posted by: Anonynous Location: Carmel on Jun 7, 2008 at 09:31 AM
There IS a "by-the-book" way to run a humane society. Check out Nathan Winograd and his book, "Redemption" http://www.nathanwinograd.com/. Indianapolis animal agencies are destroying 40 animals/day. The Humane Society director is making six figures. There is an organization in Indianapolis that is bringing to the publics' attention the behind the scenes operations and financial doings of the humane society there. Anyone interested in animal welfare reform should visit their website at www.movetoact.org. What an agency says they're doing and what they actually are doing are 2 entirely different things. In Indianapolis the partnership with the city to help animals is hardly what it is made out to be. Here in Hamilton Co and surrounding counties we are seeing a lot of Indianapolis animals coming our way because of the horrendous reputation of the Indianapolis H.S. management and money issues. They have closed their doors to strays but want your money. Rosey picture not.

Posted by: Roger Location: Granger on Jun 7, 2008 at 09:22 AM
She should be locked up in a cage, forgotten, just like she has done to the animals. Check out what I'am trying to do for these animals, and animals all over the country. URL: http://www.habitat4pets.com/ or MySpace URL: http://www.myspace.com/habitat4pets

Posted by: Heather Location: Elkhart on Jun 6, 2008 at 11:56 PM
What about comparing them against the Humane Society of Elkhart County which serves the entire Elkhart County and City? They also do animal control, have to take in strays and whatever people drop off, and are a not-for-profit. According to the Elkhart County Humane Society website, they took in over 10,000 animals last year which is more than SJCHS took in according to this report. When you walk in their shelter, it does not burn the nose or eyes and is welcoming as far a Humane Societies are considered. Maybe WNDU needs to check out a Humane Society which is in this area and does not seem to have the warehousing issue like St Joe. Just a thought....

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 6, 2008 at 11:34 PM
If the St. Joe Humane Society wants to become a no-kill facility with their own agenda, then perhaps the animal control contracts do need to be given to another entity. If they are not going to take on the responsibility to do what needs to be done to humanely care for the animals that they take in or CONTROL the population as needed, should they be getting payment for it? They are not like other animal control agencies because they also charge people to surrender animals. Animals are being dumped on the street or dropped in boxes at other facilities because people can't afford the fees at SJHS. They also don't have enough officers to answer the calls of an entire county or enough staff or volunteers to care for 500. As far as reaching out to rescue, at this time it only appears to be for cats because of the carrier situation. I don't blame the city or county officials for not offering more money to the current HS administration. I do implore them to step up and demand change.

Posted by: Bob Location: Granger on Jun 6, 2008 at 10:46 PM
Very interesting article.... Unfortunately, I see no investigative efforts into the St. Joseph Co. Humane Societies leadership, and the regulations of the terms of officers as written in their bylaws... A quick check will show the current director has been in charge for decades... something out of the boundaries of the bylaws of the organization... It's far overdue to get some new blood and ideas into the top position on the board...


Five Day
WNDU News Poll
There are currently no active polls at this time.
Click here to view other polls on our site and past poll results.
MichianaGuide.com