Four bitten in two separate dog attacks Save Email Print
Posted: 11:59 PM Apr 29, 2008
Last Updated: 12:23 AM Apr 30, 2008
Reporter: Sarah Platt
Email Address: sarah.platt@wndu.com

A | A | A

Four people were bitten by dogs Tuesday afternoon, after two separate dog attacks. Three people were sent to the hospital. Both incidents happened in South Bend. Three people were hospitalized, including a young boy.

South Bend City’s Animal Control tells Newscenter 16 both of those dogs were put down on Tuesday. Police had to shoot one of the dogs at the scene, while the other was euthanized after South Bend Animal Control took it in. Valerie Rice's son was playing in the front yard with a friend when she heard screaming. It turns out her fiancé’s dog, a German shepherd mix, had escaped through the back fence and bit her son's friend. “It was pretty bad, I knew he was going to need some stitches, knew that,” says Valerie Rice.

Rice says the dog bit the boy in the face and then bit her on the arm. "I wanted to hurry up and call animal control and by the time I did that, the police was here," adds Rice. “I feel bad, I feel real bad.”

Not long after police and South Bend’s Animal Control were called to the Leer Street house, they were called to a home on Chestnut Street, after a dog attacked two adults. “He was inside the fence here and busted through here,” explains Bruce Benman, whose friend was attacked by the dog.

Two men were attacked by the dog, a pit-bull mix, in this incident. Police first tried to taze the dog, that didn't work, so animal control says police had to shoot it to death. “It's too bad, it was a nice dog, well-trained, we don't know what happened,” says Benman.

Benman says no one knows why the dog turned violent. He says no one was provoking it. “It's too bad this happened. I hope Richie is going to be alright, concerned with him being a diabetic and the wounds healing,” adds Benman.

Police arrested the owner of the dog for disorderly conduct, apparently acting out after police killed his dog.

Needless to say, the activity has kept South Bend City's Animal Control busier than usual. “It was unusual today with the severity of the cases we’re dealing with,” says Kim Lucas of South Bend City Animal Control.

It's unclear what the conditions of the victims are, although animal control officials say the bites are serious.

If you’re approached by a dog you think is dangerous, South Bend City’s Animal Control has some advice: Remain calm, slowly back or walk away from the dog and don't make eye contact.
If it's more serious, and the dog has you on the ground, they say it’s best to curl up in a ball and cover your ears. They say the ears are often the first place dogs will go.

If you see an animal of concern in your neighborhood, contact your local animal control unit.

More Stories
Zorich, Paterno, Flutie lead class into College Football Hall of Fame

Plans to help Monaco workers start to develop

Casting out on Lake Erie with Captain Dale Collins

From humble beginnings, Venetian Festival now a staple of summer

Enshrinement Festival parade a big hit, despite rain

Friday night fun at the 30th annual Venetian Festival

Could aftershock follow Monaco layoffs?

First week of trial ends for dead infant case

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: t location on May 10, 2008 at 03:44 PM
I do not think I am smart... I know I am. And nobody likes to hear the truth. And thank you for proving that over again. Theres a name... brave now just like you.

Posted by: S Location: Mishwaka on May 9, 2008 at 04:10 PM
AC, yes you're right. They just changed the laws in county this last year. I'm sorry you had a bad experience with one of these dogs. They truly can be remarkable companions. My four kids adore mine and the dogs would do anything in the world to protect them. If you are ever looking to widen your opinion of them, let me know. I would love to show you their potential.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 9, 2008 at 04:08 PM
Anonymous: you think you're smart huh? What you said was discriminatory and ignorant. It's just sad that you are not bright enough to realize that. "Most" is not an accurate assumption. "Some" maybe. I could muzzle my dog all day long and that will not stop morons like you from letting your unmuzzled and unleashed dogs from approaching me, will it? But I guess that's alright. So, how should I label you? Are you the one that walks down the street in your golf visor, swinging around your bag of poop? Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't put this on your PDA. Right? Grow up and get a life. Or maybe just be brave enough to leave your name that way we all know who to steer clear of in "our sagging pants" with our "4in. wide chains we can barely hold on to." I'm going to laugh the day you get bit by a dog owned by one of "your types of people".

Posted by: Anonymous on May 8, 2008 at 12:45 PM
S location you sound so stupid that it is almost sad to even comment back to you but I guess I will bring myself to do so. It was never said that insurance companies will not cover a pitull. I know they *will*. And yes thats a fact.. as youv stated.. you sound very intelligent by the way. Wikipedia? I was simply stating the fact that most people with a pitbull do not have car insurance let alone take the time to go and get home insurance to cover their pitbull. Nor do they muzzel them in public like St Joe county requires. All you see is pants sagging to the ground and a 'leash' thats about a 4inch wide chain that the owner can barely hold on to. Are you understanding or would you like me to use crayons next time?

Posted by: J Location: Mishawaka on May 8, 2008 at 12:01 PM
My dog bit me and he is a small dog., but due my stupidity in trying to break up a fight. I got cellulitis from this bit, but would never give up my animal. There is usually a reason that they do this. I was walking at work and had a pit bul follow me and he was a very gentle guy. After our walk he just plopped down and I petted him. You can usually tell aggressive animals.

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 8, 2008 at 11:14 AM
I don't know if the laws have changed, but there are different rules about pitbulls in the city versus those who live outside city limits, or at least there were when I called the Humane Society.

Posted by: Hmmm.. on May 8, 2008 at 03:27 AM
I just read in another article on this situation that it was reported by police that they have confirmed at least the attack on one of the men to have been provoked.He grabbed the dog's owner and the dog reacted to what it believed was a threat.As usual, people don't know facts.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 8, 2008 at 02:59 AM
If the Humane Society was called, I find it very hard to believe that these people did not have the proper licensing for their pit.Through personal experience I know that upon the initial report you have 14 days to get the license or you will get a warrant issued.Upon reentering the city once you've obtained on, you have 2 days.That may be why they got rid of it.As far as the ignorant comment saying we don't have car insurance...check your facts.Those who don't insure their dogs are not responsible.It is hard to find a company that will insure a renter for these dogs, but a home owner can get coverage because the insurance companies can't deny coverage.

Posted by: Anonymous on May 7, 2008 at 07:52 PM
most people with pitbulls aint even got car insurance let alone house insurance to cover the dog bites. Don't matter if owners are liable... no one will be getting their medical bills paid.

Posted by: Anonymous on May 7, 2008 at 07:49 PM
Anon it is almost sad how ignorant you sound. Anyone who believes your stupidity is just as ignorant. You hear what you wana hear and tell half of your made up story. I am 100% there was a lot more said before threats were made to your dog. If threats were made it was because of your mouth. Your like 1 of them " oh shoooott... i dont care take me to jail.. il go to jail..." soon as them cuffs are on your whole story changes. We all know the type. Just be realistic. Nobody normal believes the things you are saying.

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 7, 2008 at 07:29 PM
S- I initially called the Humane Society on more than one occasion and explained the situation to them. No one from their agency came out, to my knowledge, but they did send the county police to the neighbor's house to speak to the owners about the proper way to contain their dog. Nothing really came of that. The neighbors did, however, get rid of the dog after I told them that they would wish they were dead if their dog ever hurt my child and perhaps they'd better rethink their decision to own a dog they didn't take care of. A little dramatic, you may say, but nothing got their attention until that exchange and I guess that the threat of a lawsuit was enough FINALLY. (Human mothers can be aggressive when provoked, as well!)

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 7, 2008 at 03:03 PM
AC-CALM DOWN!!IT WAS A QUESTION NOT AN ACCUSATION!!I asked if you had reason to be afraid of the dog.The dog had growled.Okay.As far as the doll, I just think you're reading too far into a situation that don't really know anything about.People hold toys in the air for their dogs all the time and "egg them on" to get the toy.Just because it was a doll I don't think that is justification for you to assume the animal would have recognized a child as a doll.Be apprehensive, okay.I think the proper way to have handled the situation would have been to call a professional, like a humane officer, to investigate the situation and if it truly were neglected and dangerous they would have made a professional opinion of the dog and would have removed it if it were it was deemed to be as bad as you claim.Do I blame you?Yes and no.Being afraid did not resolve the issue and if the dog were neglected you could have helped both the dog and yourself if you would have reported it to the right people.

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 7, 2008 at 10:42 AM
S - I didn't get out of the car because I DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE MY 2-YEAR OLD IN MY ARMS IF THE DOG DECIDED TO JUMP AND/OR BITE!( It's one thing for me to get bitten, but to put a child in a potentially dangerous situation is wrong.) The dog had growled at us on a previous occasion. I'm not an idiot. I don't hate dogs, either. (I raised my dog of thirteen years from birth and I took much care and time making sure that he was well-trained. He passed away last month.) I grew up with animals of all kinds and I do have an idea of what provokes them. I also know that neglected animals can be aggressive and this animal was definitely neglected. I'd seen his owner dangling his sister's baby doll at the dog while his teenaged friends stood around laughing and egging the dog on. Now tell me, do you blame me for not getting out of the car?? The thought of him shaking my daughter like he did that baby doll makes my blood run cold.

Posted by: lucy Location: south bend on May 6, 2008 at 04:28 PM
(Cont.) and by the way it was in the early 90's and dogs didn't get euthanized back then.

Posted by: lucy Location: south bend on May 6, 2008 at 04:24 PM
I don't really think it's a particular breed that's violent. I think animals react violently when they've been mistreated or feel threatened. That's the problem, people don't know how to care for animals. My friend has a pit bull and let me tell you, she's the sweetest-biggest baby (she thinks she's a lap dog), but like any animal, she could turn on someone if she was threatened. I think it's in their nature to attack when they feel threatened or mistreated. People just really need to learn how to be around and care for animals properly. My brother and cousin were attacked by dogs, but you know what they were teasing them, what do you expect?

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 6, 2008 at 04:14 PM
AC, why is it that you wouldn't get out of the car?Did the dog actually show aggression or was is just the way it looked?And Tom,I didn't see where anyone said dogs ONLY bite if provoked,what has been said is that research has proven that the MAJORITY of dog bites ARE provoked!!Being scared is a form of provocation!!DUH!Have you never been told you should never show FEAR?It is a sign of WEAKNESS!Dogs are still animal by nature and instinct of any animal is survival!The strong take the weak!!What is ridiculous is that you think that anyone should be allowed to invade another's territory/property and that they should hold no responsibilities of their own for being somewhere uninvited.Bottom line is yes, dog owners should keep their dogs under control, but strangers should stay away from someone else's dog too!You can't put all the blame on an animal who reacts by instint versus a human who is supposed to react by knowledge and education.Who is the smarter of the species?Man or Dog??

Posted by: anon Location: mishawaka on May 6, 2008 at 04:03 PM
I've been taken to jail for being "disorderly" too because I am a APBT owner and the cops were afraid of my dog. You know why I went to jail? Because the cops told me they would shoot my dog if they saw it because it was a pitbull. I refused to give the POLICE the dog, but instead allowed a HUMANE OFFICER do their job, and the cops didn't like it. So, moral of the story to the former AC officer, you are told what the cops want you to know. You don't know it from the victims standpoint. They don't always draw their guns legitimately.

Posted by: Kim Location: Knox on May 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Everyone needs to grow up and act ike adults and quit bashing everyone! Yes owners are responsible for their dogs, but owners can't control people who walk up in their yard to tease or try to pet their dogs and what r we to do stand outside with our dogs 24/7 to make sure no one comes up to them? I had 2 dogs, one Rott/Lab/Collie mix very large and and 1 Australian Blue Heeler/Shepher mix, medium, both were teased by kids in my yard, one even threw lit firecrackers at my dogs, they both re-acted differently, the smaller one wanted to go after them, my huge dog, just barked and growled once deep and low and they left! They never attacked anyone, but everytime kids went by, they associated it with those kids teasing them! In fact after the firecracker incident, I was walking my big dog and he growled at this kid I asked the kid r u one of them that threw firecrackers at my dogs and he confessed he was there but his friend threw them! My dog remembered this kid! So don't judge!

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 6, 2008 at 08:45 AM
Hey, S - My post was anything but "whiny" and "scared". I'm very educated when it comes to dogs, and, no, I don't "believe what the media tells me." My neighbors had a pit who they let wander all over the place and I couldn't go out in my yard half the time. It was to the point that I couldn't get out of my car in my driveway and carry my toddler into the house. Get this: The sole reason that said neighbor had this breed is because his teenaged son brought it home because it was "cool". I can guarantee that this young man did ZERO research on the breed or cared about its training whatsoever. He had it so he could impress his friends. Since his attention span was about 30 seconds anyway, needless to say, he lost interest in the dog completely after awhile and just let it run loose. Let me be clear: I can't stand anyone who lets a dog, especially a NEGLECTED and/or UNTRAINED dog wander around without any regard for anyone else's safety, whatever the breed!

Posted by: Tom Location: Leeburg on May 5, 2008 at 05:13 PM
To Wrong, according to the story the owner had to be taken to jail after the attack because he was acting dissorderly. I think that might make him a less than credible witness. Also the witness interviewed (Bruce Benman) said that "no one knows why the dog turned violent and that "no one was provoking it." I don't know where you got the idea that dogs only attack when provoked but with that kind of ignorance I do hope you don't own one. And as far as your comments on people who kill others, well that's just ridiculous.And the point most of us are trying to make here is that we shouldn't have to think about being scared of dogs because the owners should keep them under control AT ALL TIMES!!! I think perhaps you should follow your own advice and "think before you post". But I will say you definately chose the right name.

Posted by: WRONG Location: WRONG WRONG on May 5, 2008 at 09:13 AM
I know one of the men that was attacked and this news story was wrong. The dog was provoked according to the owner. People don't blame the dog. Dogs only react like that for a reason they don't just out of no where snap. There was something more going on that someone is keeping hush hush. My friend that was attacked is doing fine while still scared of dogs he is okay. The other man I don't know a whole lot about except he is recovering slowly. I send my prayers out to everyone effected by this but once again people think before you post. Just because a handfull of pits have attacked people they don't need to be banned or all killed...I mean seriously People kill people all the time but I don't see anyone that says well sence that man attacked the other man all men should be banned or killed...we live in a free country don't you think we have enough restricting laws? I am all about feeling safe in my own neighborhood but you can't be scared of all dogs just like we are not all people...

Posted by: Anonymous on May 4, 2008 at 08:23 AM
To a lot of people, owning a pitbull is a statement, they think it's cool to have a muscle dog, these are usually the pitbulls that end up in shelters and put to sleep due to neglect. These are the people who are ruining this breed, these are the people APB lovers need to be angry at, not the general public for not trusting or liking the breed. I'm an animal lover and I wouldn't own a pitbull either, not because I'm ignorant or uneducated on the breed, because I think they can be unpredictable like any other dog, but a pitbull can do a lot of damage if they so choose to snap, and they don't let go. Responsible APB owners need to be the only people allowed to own them, people who can handle them and take care of them properly, people who realize human safety comes first and who would NEVER allow their dog to pose a danger to any man, woman or child. This applies to any breed, but I'd rather have a Shepherd attack me than I would a pitbull.

Posted by: Anonymous on May 4, 2008 at 08:12 AM
As an ex AC officer, in my experience a police officer will NOT shoot a dog unless the dog is out of control. We don't know the full extent of the situation because we were not there to witness it, who knows how bad the dog attack was, who knows what could've happened if the police hadn't of shot it, how much damage it could've made to its victims. Police shoot dogs when there's no other option left. Safety of people comes first, it's unfortunate the dog was killed, but it was probably a neccessity. In my opinion, there's no place in this or any other community for an aggressive dog, regardless of breed. Especially, aggressive dogs that are running loose, I want my child to be able to play outside without having to worry about dogs! For those defending the pitbull, crying BSL, how discriminated against you feel... I'd like to see you have that attitude when you've been left with half your face after being mauled. Pitbulls can cause a lot of damage to a human, I've seen it.As w/ all dogs

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on May 4, 2008 at 12:04 AM
I'm reminded of the incident at the San Francisco Zoo a few months back. One guy killed by a tiger and 2 others mauled. Reports indicate that they teased the tiger which caused it to attack. Guess what, the zoo is still liable because it's their tiger and they own the sole responsibilty of controlling it. To suggest that these 4 victims in South Bend provoked these dog attacks is deplorably insensitive. But even if they did it is still the owners TOTAL and COMPLETE responsibilty to control their dogs and keep the public safe from them. And honestly S, the only reason anyone mentioned your precious pits is because one of the dogs was a pit or pit mix. But really NO ONE CARES!!! I haven't stereotyped anything I just addressed what happened. Your the one stereotyping all of us who are concerned about dangerous dogs as being ignorant or uninformed. All you seem to be concerned about is your pet breed. Your attitude is doing the pits image more harm than anything we could ever say.

Posted by: Terry Location: Orland on May 3, 2008 at 09:32 PM
I believe the article said pit bull MIX. Not a pure bred pit. Pit's can really be nice dogs. It seems a few years ago that Rotties were all viscious then it was German Sheperds and dobermans.Time will change for the pits too.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 3, 2008 at 05:33 PM
Tom-I haven't missed anything.You obviously don't pay attention, because just like many of the others you stereotyped,again.The Shepard shows that the incidents had nothing to do with BREED it had to do with that INDIVIDUAL DOG!!!!Quit acting like it had something to do with a NAME!!Too many people want to focus on name instead of what they can do to prevent incidents such as this in the future.Nearly EVERY dog bite is provoked, whether you think so or not.By educating yourself, you may learn of the MANY different ways some dogs can be provoked.Do you really think that these dogs left their territory for NO reason and bit people?No, it could have been something very subtle,but something nonetheless.If people could quit being so narrow minded long enough to see the situation for what it is instead of what type of dog it was, they may be able to prevent these similar attacks.Dogs typically react to threat...threat of territory, body or person.Learn something.

Posted by: kip Location: anonymous on May 3, 2008 at 09:50 AM
i see my comment never made it yesterday .thanks

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on May 2, 2008 at 09:41 PM
S,Let it go already. You are totally missing the point. Your so wrapped up in your APBTs you can't even see what this stream is about. Let me refresh your memory. 4 people were attacked by 2 dogs in 2 separate incidents and 3 of them had to go to the hospital. One of them happened to be a Pit Bull and it demonstrated an extremely nasty violent disposition.(Maybe this Pit Bull should have read some of your propaganda on how it isn't an agressive breed and then it wouldn't have been so violent.) And to even suggest that these people would not have gotten bit if they were more educated and acted correctly is just assinine. It's the dog owners who hold the responsibilty to be "educated" and keep their damn dogs under control. We don't have to become educated in order to make it o.k. for you to have something potentially dangerous! You have to make sure it doesn't get a chance to be. And if it does it is totally YOUR RESPONSIBILITY!!

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 2, 2008 at 04:17 PM
AC-the little boy was mangled by the shepard.I'm sorry you're scared and it makes you feel better to whine about my hurt feelings.It's not about my feelings, it's about defending the right of an animal who, if judged by idiots like you, would no longer exist.I have been bit by a dog, a border collie, but that did not make me feel that all border collies should be killed.It made me more aware of what I did to provoke the dog and how not to do it in the future.Pay attention next time, all I am saying is educate yourself and quit believing everything the media tells you to.NOT ALL PITBULLS ARE BAD!!

Posted by: Tim Location: South Bend on May 2, 2008 at 03:44 PM
Thanks for your comments Mr Range, all these dogs should be put to sleep. Kids cant even play outside. South Bend is a mess

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on May 2, 2008 at 03:43 PM
S, Why don't you send a copy of your book to the 2 individuals who just got attacked by the pit bull. I'm sure they'll be glad to hear that APBTs don't show aggression to humans. It will be a great comfort as they recover from there injuries.

Posted by: Homer Simpson on May 2, 2008 at 03:30 PM
I have a Siberian Tiger and because he was raised around people and treated really well he wouldn't hurt a flea. Of course, if he should become startled or feel like his family is threatened... so, just don't startle him, dummies. I am so tough. I am rough and tough. Look at how rough and tough I am, I keep dangerous animals. Dangerous animals make me neat.

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 2, 2008 at 02:32 PM
All this bickering...it doesn't really matter much about what various breeds do at this point, does it? THIS dog DID cause bodily injury! This little boy's face is mangled. These dogs were both menaces. Period. Really, who cares why when it's you or your family member who gets hurt??? Would anyone have had this discussion about breeds and persecution, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH while standing on the sidewalk right after it happened and the kid is screaming and bleeding??? Get real, people!! And to those who have pits who are "teddy bears" ---Good for you, but know that most of us wouldn't trust them for a minute! You can feel picked on and persecuted if it makes you feel better, but I'd get over it if I were you. No one cares about your hurt feelings! It's not all about YOU!!

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 2, 2008 at 01:45 PM
For those interested try this book: "American Pit Bull Terriers" by Elaine Waldorf Gewirtz (Sponsored by the Animal Planet). "Sometime around their first birthdays, APBTs begin to show aggressive tendencies toward other animals...this aggression does not turn into people aggression.This is because when APBTS were used as fighting animals, any dog who turned on his handler was removed from the gene pool." Once again EDUCATE DON'T DISCRIMINATE!! FIGHT BSL!!What is law for one dog should be law for ALL DOGS.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 2, 2008 at 01:21 PM
Concerned-your right.Putting a 50 to 80 pound dog against a, what, 400 pound bull is real favorable odds for a dog right?No.That's why it was banned, however, that doesn't mean the dog would be more HUMAN aggressive, just more protective of itself and any humans that would come into harm.I also didn't say the Shepard did not NEED to be shot, I said it wasn't.It probably wouldn't have been if it were biting someone, because they are not feared the same.Pits do not have a disposition for violence.They are bred responsibly to protect families.It is the people that train them to protect materialistic objects that ruin the dog.Research has proven that.Yes, I know they are still used for fighting, but that is not done by responsible owners which is unfortunate.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 2, 2008 at 01:13 PM
Connie and Concerned-you need to quit believing that the pit was shot "because it was chewing on a man."No where in the article did it say it was attacking someone when it was shot.Plain and simple, it was shot because people FEAR the breed.Cops are trigger happy with that which they fear.I've seen that first hand when it involves a Pit.You're right Connie, you didn't say "dog fighting", you just said "Pits are fighting dogs." I am so sorry to have misquoted you. The only dog I've ever been bitten by was a Border Collie, yet I don't see people having to muzzle them.I guess all in all my problem is idiots who believe all the junk other idiots post who then give the breed problems over their own fears and anxieties.If you have done the research you would know how off most of the comments have been.Pits pass temperment testing at a higher rate than almost any other breed.So, prone to aggression is a bias comment.Do your research over and educate, quit condemning.

Posted by: Connie Location: Warsaw on May 1, 2008 at 10:23 PM
S-Mishawaka 5/1-4:27--No where in my postings have I used the phrase "dog fighting" and since baiting simply means "bull fighti