Four bitten in two separate dog attacks
Four bitten in two separate dog attacks Save Email Print
Posted: 11:59 PM Apr 29, 2008
Last Updated: 12:23 AM Apr 30, 2008
Reporter: Sarah Platt
Email Address: sarah.platt@wndu.com

A | A | A

Four people were bitten by dogs Tuesday afternoon, after two separate dog attacks. Three people were sent to the hospital. Both incidents happened in South Bend. Three people were hospitalized, including a young boy.

South Bend City’s Animal Control tells Newscenter 16 both of those dogs were put down on Tuesday. Police had to shoot one of the dogs at the scene, while the other was euthanized after South Bend Animal Control took it in. Valerie Rice's son was playing in the front yard with a friend when she heard screaming. It turns out her fiancé’s dog, a German shepherd mix, had escaped through the back fence and bit her son's friend. “It was pretty bad, I knew he was going to need some stitches, knew that,” says Valerie Rice.

Rice says the dog bit the boy in the face and then bit her on the arm. "I wanted to hurry up and call animal control and by the time I did that, the police was here," adds Rice. “I feel bad, I feel real bad.”

Not long after police and South Bend’s Animal Control were called to the Leer Street house, they were called to a home on Chestnut Street, after a dog attacked two adults. “He was inside the fence here and busted through here,” explains Bruce Benman, whose friend was attacked by the dog.

Two men were attacked by the dog, a pit-bull mix, in this incident. Police first tried to taze the dog, that didn't work, so animal control says police had to shoot it to death. “It's too bad, it was a nice dog, well-trained, we don't know what happened,” says Benman.

Benman says no one knows why the dog turned violent. He says no one was provoking it. “It's too bad this happened. I hope Richie is going to be alright, concerned with him being a diabetic and the wounds healing,” adds Benman.

Police arrested the owner of the dog for disorderly conduct, apparently acting out after police killed his dog.

Needless to say, the activity has kept South Bend City's Animal Control busier than usual. “It was unusual today with the severity of the cases we’re dealing with,” says Kim Lucas of South Bend City Animal Control.

It's unclear what the conditions of the victims are, although animal control officials say the bites are serious.

If you’re approached by a dog you think is dangerous, South Bend City’s Animal Control has some advice: Remain calm, slowly back or walk away from the dog and don't make eye contact.
If it's more serious, and the dog has you on the ground, they say it’s best to curl up in a ball and cover your ears. They say the ears are often the first place dogs will go.

If you see an animal of concern in your neighborhood, contact your local animal control unit.

More Stories
ATF agents raid the Warsaw home of a known white supremacist

Granger man turns hobby into business with D'Avella Family Winery

Update: Woman and children recovering after car crashes into store window

U93 kicks off annual Roofsit campaign to help prevent child abuse

Part of Cleveland Avenue closed in St. Joe

Man hospitalized after motorcycle accident

80-year-old Niles man shot, robbed at home; suspects arrested

Golfer Chris Smith and family still in shock over weekend accident

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: t location on May 10, 2008 at 03:44 PM
I do not think I am smart... I know I am. And nobody likes to hear the truth. And thank you for proving that over again. Theres a name... brave now just like you.

Posted by: S Location: Mishwaka on May 9, 2008 at 04:10 PM
AC, yes you're right. They just changed the laws in county this last year. I'm sorry you had a bad experience with one of these dogs. They truly can be remarkable companions. My four kids adore mine and the dogs would do anything in the world to protect them. If you are ever looking to widen your opinion of them, let me know. I would love to show you their potential.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 9, 2008 at 04:08 PM
Anonymous: you think you're smart huh? What you said was discriminatory and ignorant. It's just sad that you are not bright enough to realize that. "Most" is not an accurate assumption. "Some" maybe. I could muzzle my dog all day long and that will not stop morons like you from letting your unmuzzled and unleashed dogs from approaching me, will it? But I guess that's alright. So, how should I label you? Are you the one that walks down the street in your golf visor, swinging around your bag of poop? Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't put this on your PDA. Right? Grow up and get a life. Or maybe just be brave enough to leave your name that way we all know who to steer clear of in "our sagging pants" with our "4in. wide chains we can barely hold on to." I'm going to laugh the day you get bit by a dog owned by one of "your types of people".

Posted by: Anonymous on May 8, 2008 at 12:45 PM
S location you sound so stupid that it is almost sad to even comment back to you but I guess I will bring myself to do so. It was never said that insurance companies will not cover a pitull. I know they *will*. And yes thats a fact.. as youv stated.. you sound very intelligent by the way. Wikipedia? I was simply stating the fact that most people with a pitbull do not have car insurance let alone take the time to go and get home insurance to cover their pitbull. Nor do they muzzel them in public like St Joe county requires. All you see is pants sagging to the ground and a 'leash' thats about a 4inch wide chain that the owner can barely hold on to. Are you understanding or would you like me to use crayons next time?

Posted by: J Location: Mishawaka on May 8, 2008 at 12:01 PM
My dog bit me and he is a small dog., but due my stupidity in trying to break up a fight. I got cellulitis from this bit, but would never give up my animal. There is usually a reason that they do this. I was walking at work and had a pit bul follow me and he was a very gentle guy. After our walk he just plopped down and I petted him. You can usually tell aggressive animals.

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 8, 2008 at 11:14 AM
I don't know if the laws have changed, but there are different rules about pitbulls in the city versus those who live outside city limits, or at least there were when I called the Humane Society.

Posted by: Hmmm.. on May 8, 2008 at 03:27 AM
I just read in another article on this situation that it was reported by police that they have confirmed at least the attack on one of the men to have been provoked.He grabbed the dog's owner and the dog reacted to what it believed was a threat.As usual, people don't know facts.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 8, 2008 at 02:59 AM
If the Humane Society was called, I find it very hard to believe that these people did not have the proper licensing for their pit.Through personal experience I know that upon the initial report you have 14 days to get the license or you will get a warrant issued.Upon reentering the city once you've obtained on, you have 2 days.That may be why they got rid of it.As far as the ignorant comment saying we don't have car insurance...check your facts.Those who don't insure their dogs are not responsible.It is hard to find a company that will insure a renter for these dogs, but a home owner can get coverage because the insurance companies can't deny coverage.

Posted by: Anonymous on May 7, 2008 at 07:52 PM
most people with pitbulls aint even got car insurance let alone house insurance to cover the dog bites. Don't matter if owners are liable... no one will be getting their medical bills paid.

Posted by: Anonymous on May 7, 2008 at 07:49 PM
Anon it is almost sad how ignorant you sound. Anyone who believes your stupidity is just as ignorant. You hear what you wana hear and tell half of your made up story. I am 100% there was a lot more said before threats were made to your dog. If threats were made it was because of your mouth. Your like 1 of them " oh shoooott... i dont care take me to jail.. il go to jail..." soon as them cuffs are on your whole story changes. We all know the type. Just be realistic. Nobody normal believes the things you are saying.

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 7, 2008 at 07:29 PM
S- I initially called the Humane Society on more than one occasion and explained the situation to them. No one from their agency came out, to my knowledge, but they did send the county police to the neighbor's house to speak to the owners about the proper way to contain their dog. Nothing really came of that. The neighbors did, however, get rid of the dog after I told them that they would wish they were dead if their dog ever hurt my child and perhaps they'd better rethink their decision to own a dog they didn't take care of. A little dramatic, you may say, but nothing got their attention until that exchange and I guess that the threat of a lawsuit was enough FINALLY. (Human mothers can be aggressive when provoked, as well!)

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 7, 2008 at 03:03 PM
AC-CALM DOWN!!IT WAS A QUESTION NOT AN ACCUSATION!!I asked if you had reason to be afraid of the dog.The dog had growled.Okay.As far as the doll, I just think you're reading too far into a situation that don't really know anything about.People hold toys in the air for their dogs all the time and "egg them on" to get the toy.Just because it was a doll I don't think that is justification for you to assume the animal would have recognized a child as a doll.Be apprehensive, okay.I think the proper way to have handled the situation would have been to call a professional, like a humane officer, to investigate the situation and if it truly were neglected and dangerous they would have made a professional opinion of the dog and would have removed it if it were it was deemed to be as bad as you claim.Do I blame you?Yes and no.Being afraid did not resolve the issue and if the dog were neglected you could have helped both the dog and yourself if you would have reported it to the right people.

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 7, 2008 at 10:42 AM
S - I didn't get out of the car because I DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE MY 2-YEAR OLD IN MY ARMS IF THE DOG DECIDED TO JUMP AND/OR BITE!( It's one thing for me to get bitten, but to put a child in a potentially dangerous situation is wrong.) The dog had growled at us on a previous occasion. I'm not an idiot. I don't hate dogs, either. (I raised my dog of thirteen years from birth and I took much care and time making sure that he was well-trained. He passed away last month.) I grew up with animals of all kinds and I do have an idea of what provokes them. I also know that neglected animals can be aggressive and this animal was definitely neglected. I'd seen his owner dangling his sister's baby doll at the dog while his teenaged friends stood around laughing and egging the dog on. Now tell me, do you blame me for not getting out of the car?? The thought of him shaking my daughter like he did that baby doll makes my blood run cold.

Posted by: lucy Location: south bend on May 6, 2008 at 04:28 PM
(Cont.) and by the way it was in the early 90's and dogs didn't get euthanized back then.

Posted by: lucy Location: south bend on May 6, 2008 at 04:24 PM
I don't really think it's a particular breed that's violent. I think animals react violently when they've been mistreated or feel threatened. That's the problem, people don't know how to care for animals. My friend has a pit bull and let me tell you, she's the sweetest-biggest baby (she thinks she's a lap dog), but like any animal, she could turn on someone if she was threatened. I think it's in their nature to attack when they feel threatened or mistreated. People just really need to learn how to be around and care for animals properly. My brother and cousin were attacked by dogs, but you know what they were teasing them, what do you expect?

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 6, 2008 at 04:14 PM
AC, why is it that you wouldn't get out of the car?Did the dog actually show aggression or was is just the way it looked?And Tom,I didn't see where anyone said dogs ONLY bite if provoked,what has been said is that research has proven that the MAJORITY of dog bites ARE provoked!!Being scared is a form of provocation!!DUH!Have you never been told you should never show FEAR?It is a sign of WEAKNESS!Dogs are still animal by nature and instinct of any animal is survival!The strong take the weak!!What is ridiculous is that you think that anyone should be allowed to invade another's territory/property and that they should hold no responsibilities of their own for being somewhere uninvited.Bottom line is yes, dog owners should keep their dogs under control, but strangers should stay away from someone else's dog too!You can't put all the blame on an animal who reacts by instint versus a human who is supposed to react by knowledge and education.Who is the smarter of the species?Man or Dog??

Posted by: anon Location: mishawaka on May 6, 2008 at 04:03 PM
I've been taken to jail for being "disorderly" too because I am a APBT owner and the cops were afraid of my dog. You know why I went to jail? Because the cops told me they would shoot my dog if they saw it because it was a pitbull. I refused to give the POLICE the dog, but instead allowed a HUMANE OFFICER do their job, and the cops didn't like it. So, moral of the story to the former AC officer, you are told what the cops want you to know. You don't know it from the victims standpoint. They don't always draw their guns legitimately.

Posted by: Kim Location: Knox on May 6, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Everyone needs to grow up and act ike adults and quit bashing everyone! Yes owners are responsible for their dogs, but owners can't control people who walk up in their yard to tease or try to pet their dogs and what r we to do stand outside with our dogs 24/7 to make sure no one comes up to them? I had 2 dogs, one Rott/Lab/Collie mix very large and and 1 Australian Blue Heeler/Shepher mix, medium, both were teased by kids in my yard, one even threw lit firecrackers at my dogs, they both re-acted differently, the smaller one wanted to go after them, my huge dog, just barked and growled once deep and low and they left! They never attacked anyone, but everytime kids went by, they associated it with those kids teasing them! In fact after the firecracker incident, I was walking my big dog and he growled at this kid I asked the kid r u one of them that threw firecrackers at my dogs and he confessed he was there but his friend threw them! My dog remembered this kid! So don't judge!

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 6, 2008 at 08:45 AM
Hey, S - My post was anything but "whiny" and "scared". I'm very educated when it comes to dogs, and, no, I don't "believe what the media tells me." My neighbors had a pit who they let wander all over the place and I couldn't go out in my yard half the time. It was to the point that I couldn't get out of my car in my driveway and carry my toddler into the house. Get this: The sole reason that said neighbor had this breed is because his teenaged son brought it home because it was "cool". I can guarantee that this young man did ZERO research on the breed or cared about its training whatsoever. He had it so he could impress his friends. Since his attention span was about 30 seconds anyway, needless to say, he lost interest in the dog completely after awhile and just let it run loose. Let me be clear: I can't stand anyone who lets a dog, especially a NEGLECTED and/or UNTRAINED dog wander around without any regard for anyone else's safety, whatever the breed!

Posted by: Tom Location: Leeburg on May 5, 2008 at 05:13 PM
To Wrong, according to the story the owner had to be taken to jail after the attack because he was acting dissorderly. I think that might make him a less than credible witness. Also the witness interviewed (Bruce Benman) said that "no one knows why the dog turned violent and that "no one was provoking it." I don't know where you got the idea that dogs only attack when provoked but with that kind of ignorance I do hope you don't own one. And as far as your comments on people who kill others, well that's just ridiculous.And the point most of us are trying to make here is that we shouldn't have to think about being scared of dogs because the owners should keep them under control AT ALL TIMES!!! I think perhaps you should follow your own advice and "think before you post". But I will say you definately chose the right name.

Posted by: WRONG Location: WRONG WRONG on May 5, 2008 at 09:13 AM
I know one of the men that was attacked and this news story was wrong. The dog was provoked according to the owner. People don't blame the dog. Dogs only react like that for a reason they don't just out of no where snap. There was something more going on that someone is keeping hush hush. My friend that was attacked is doing fine while still scared of dogs he is okay. The other man I don't know a whole lot about except he is recovering slowly. I send my prayers out to everyone effected by this but once again people think before you post. Just because a handfull of pits have attacked people they don't need to be banned or all killed...I mean seriously People kill people all the time but I don't see anyone that says well sence that man attacked the other man all men should be banned or killed...we live in a free country don't you think we have enough restricting laws? I am all about feeling safe in my own neighborhood but you can't be scared of all dogs just like we are not all people...

Posted by: Anonymous on May 4, 2008 at 08:23 AM
To a lot of people, owning a pitbull is a statement, they think it's cool to have a muscle dog, these are usually the pitbulls that end up in shelters and put to sleep due to neglect. These are the people who are ruining this breed, these are the people APB lovers need to be angry at, not the general public for not trusting or liking the breed. I'm an animal lover and I wouldn't own a pitbull either, not because I'm ignorant or uneducated on the breed, because I think they can be unpredictable like any other dog, but a pitbull can do a lot of damage if they so choose to snap, and they don't let go. Responsible APB owners need to be the only people allowed to own them, people who can handle them and take care of them properly, people who realize human safety comes first and who would NEVER allow their dog to pose a danger to any man, woman or child. This applies to any breed, but I'd rather have a Shepherd attack me than I would a pitbull.

Posted by: Anonymous on May 4, 2008 at 08:12 AM
As an ex AC officer, in my experience a police officer will NOT shoot a dog unless the dog is out of control. We don't know the full extent of the situation because we were not there to witness it, who knows how bad the dog attack was, who knows what could've happened if the police hadn't of shot it, how much damage it could've made to its victims. Police shoot dogs when there's no other option left. Safety of people comes first, it's unfortunate the dog was killed, but it was probably a neccessity. In my opinion, there's no place in this or any other community for an aggressive dog, regardless of breed. Especially, aggressive dogs that are running loose, I want my child to be able to play outside without having to worry about dogs! For those defending the pitbull, crying BSL, how discriminated against you feel... I'd like to see you have that attitude when you've been left with half your face after being mauled. Pitbulls can cause a lot of damage to a human, I've seen it.As w/ all dogs

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on May 4, 2008 at 12:04 AM
I'm reminded of the incident at the San Francisco Zoo a few months back. One guy killed by a tiger and 2 others mauled. Reports indicate that they teased the tiger which caused it to attack. Guess what, the zoo is still liable because it's their tiger and they own the sole responsibilty of controlling it. To suggest that these 4 victims in South Bend provoked these dog attacks is deplorably insensitive. But even if they did it is still the owners TOTAL and COMPLETE responsibilty to control their dogs and keep the public safe from them. And honestly S, the only reason anyone mentioned your precious pits is because one of the dogs was a pit or pit mix. But really NO ONE CARES!!! I haven't stereotyped anything I just addressed what happened. Your the one stereotyping all of us who are concerned about dangerous dogs as being ignorant or uninformed. All you seem to be concerned about is your pet breed. Your attitude is doing the pits image more harm than anything we could ever say.

Posted by: Terry Location: Orland on May 3, 2008 at 09:32 PM
I believe the article said pit bull MIX. Not a pure bred pit. Pit's can really be nice dogs. It seems a few years ago that Rotties were all viscious then it was German Sheperds and dobermans.Time will change for the pits too.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 3, 2008 at 05:33 PM
Tom-I haven't missed anything.You obviously don't pay attention, because just like many of the others you stereotyped,again.The Shepard shows that the incidents had nothing to do with BREED it had to do with that INDIVIDUAL DOG!!!!Quit acting like it had something to do with a NAME!!Too many people want to focus on name instead of what they can do to prevent incidents such as this in the future.Nearly EVERY dog bite is provoked, whether you think so or not.By educating yourself, you may learn of the MANY different ways some dogs can be provoked.Do you really think that these dogs left their territory for NO reason and bit people?No, it could have been something very subtle,but something nonetheless.If people could quit being so narrow minded long enough to see the situation for what it is instead of what type of dog it was, they may be able to prevent these similar attacks.Dogs typically react to threat...threat of territory, body or person.Learn something.

Posted by: kip Location: anonymous on May 3, 2008 at 09:50 AM
i see my comment never made it yesterday .thanks

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on May 2, 2008 at 09:41 PM
S,Let it go already. You are totally missing the point. Your so wrapped up in your APBTs you can't even see what this stream is about. Let me refresh your memory. 4 people were attacked by 2 dogs in 2 separate incidents and 3 of them had to go to the hospital. One of them happened to be a Pit Bull and it demonstrated an extremely nasty violent disposition.(Maybe this Pit Bull should have read some of your propaganda on how it isn't an agressive breed and then it wouldn't have been so violent.) And to even suggest that these people would not have gotten bit if they were more educated and acted correctly is just assinine. It's the dog owners who hold the responsibilty to be "educated" and keep their damn dogs under control. We don't have to become educated in order to make it o.k. for you to have something potentially dangerous! You have to make sure it doesn't get a chance to be. And if it does it is totally YOUR RESPONSIBILITY!!

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 2, 2008 at 04:17 PM
AC-the little boy was mangled by the shepard.I'm sorry you're scared and it makes you feel better to whine about my hurt feelings.It's not about my feelings, it's about defending the right of an animal who, if judged by idiots like you, would no longer exist.I have been bit by a dog, a border collie, but that did not make me feel that all border collies should be killed.It made me more aware of what I did to provoke the dog and how not to do it in the future.Pay attention next time, all I am saying is educate yourself and quit believing everything the media tells you to.NOT ALL PITBULLS ARE BAD!!

Posted by: Tim Location: South Bend on May 2, 2008 at 03:44 PM
Thanks for your comments Mr Range, all these dogs should be put to sleep. Kids cant even play outside. South Bend is a mess

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on May 2, 2008 at 03:43 PM
S, Why don't you send a copy of your book to the 2 individuals who just got attacked by the pit bull. I'm sure they'll be glad to hear that APBTs don't show aggression to humans. It will be a great comfort as they recover from there injuries.

Posted by: Homer Simpson on May 2, 2008 at 03:30 PM
I have a Siberian Tiger and because he was raised around people and treated really well he wouldn't hurt a flea. Of course, if he should become startled or feel like his family is threatened... so, just don't startle him, dummies. I am so tough. I am rough and tough. Look at how rough and tough I am, I keep dangerous animals. Dangerous animals make me neat.

Posted by: AC Location: South Bend on May 2, 2008 at 02:32 PM
All this bickering...it doesn't really matter much about what various breeds do at this point, does it? THIS dog DID cause bodily injury! This little boy's face is mangled. These dogs were both menaces. Period. Really, who cares why when it's you or your family member who gets hurt??? Would anyone have had this discussion about breeds and persecution, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH while standing on the sidewalk right after it happened and the kid is screaming and bleeding??? Get real, people!! And to those who have pits who are "teddy bears" ---Good for you, but know that most of us wouldn't trust them for a minute! You can feel picked on and persecuted if it makes you feel better, but I'd get over it if I were you. No one cares about your hurt feelings! It's not all about YOU!!

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 2, 2008 at 01:45 PM
For those interested try this book: "American Pit Bull Terriers" by Elaine Waldorf Gewirtz (Sponsored by the Animal Planet). "Sometime around their first birthdays, APBTs begin to show aggressive tendencies toward other animals...this aggression does not turn into people aggression.This is because when APBTS were used as fighting animals, any dog who turned on his handler was removed from the gene pool." Once again EDUCATE DON'T DISCRIMINATE!! FIGHT BSL!!What is law for one dog should be law for ALL DOGS.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 2, 2008 at 01:21 PM
Concerned-your right.Putting a 50 to 80 pound dog against a, what, 400 pound bull is real favorable odds for a dog right?No.That's why it was banned, however, that doesn't mean the dog would be more HUMAN aggressive, just more protective of itself and any humans that would come into harm.I also didn't say the Shepard did not NEED to be shot, I said it wasn't.It probably wouldn't have been if it were biting someone, because they are not feared the same.Pits do not have a disposition for violence.They are bred responsibly to protect families.It is the people that train them to protect materialistic objects that ruin the dog.Research has proven that.Yes, I know they are still used for fighting, but that is not done by responsible owners which is unfortunate.

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 2, 2008 at 01:13 PM
Connie and Concerned-you need to quit believing that the pit was shot "because it was chewing on a man."No where in the article did it say it was attacking someone when it was shot.Plain and simple, it was shot because people FEAR the breed.Cops are trigger happy with that which they fear.I've seen that first hand when it involves a Pit.You're right Connie, you didn't say "dog fighting", you just said "Pits are fighting dogs." I am so sorry to have misquoted you. The only dog I've ever been bitten by was a Border Collie, yet I don't see people having to muzzle them.I guess all in all my problem is idiots who believe all the junk other idiots post who then give the breed problems over their own fears and anxieties.If you have done the research you would know how off most of the comments have been.Pits pass temperment testing at a higher rate than almost any other breed.So, prone to aggression is a bias comment.Do your research over and educate, quit condemning.

Posted by: Connie Location: Warsaw on May 1, 2008 at 10:23 PM
S-Mishawaka 5/1-4:27--No where in my postings have I used the phrase "dog fighting" and since baiting simply means "bull fighting" I stand by my use of the word in my description of the PitBull. My point was that some breeds are beyond the capabilities of many of the "sub-average" people who are drawn to their "tough" image. I am not against the PitBulls/AmStaff, nor am I against any other challenging dog breed-only against idiots getting their hands on them, just like I'm not against 18 wheelers, just incompentent fools driving them. Both are disasters waiting to happen. And I did mention in my previous posts that ENFORCING EXISTING LAWS are part of my personal vision for improvement. As for adopting, I never mentioned adopting pits, so I don't know what your problem is. BTW:as it says in the article- the shepherd wasn't as out of control, so it was taken and euthanized instead of shot.

Posted by: Connie Location: Warsaw on May 1, 2008 at 10:00 PM
I&P-Just a few weeks ago a shelter rep was on WNDU in the morning trying to cajole the public into taking home an "adorable corgi mix", which not only looked remarkably like the photos of the Akitas in all my breed books, but she said that it "didn't seem to get along with other dogs" which should have alarmed her (& anyone watching) since the dog had to weigh upwards of 80lbs. That's SO NOT a corgi. I researched the dogs I took home, and unfortunately, being young, I accepted some of the "information" the people gave me. When my "terrier" mix-which looked like a terrier at 2 months (even had tiny feet), bloomed into an obvious German shepherd at 5months, I figured out someone had lied about the parentage. Ditto a couple of other dogs, which all had to go back to the pound because they don't allow you to find them homes, and they were too big for my lease. All the questions I asked accomplished nothing for anyone. As for your childish insults, I'll excuse your Immaturity and Pettiness.

Posted by: Concerned Location: K.Cty. on May 1, 2008 at 08:39 PM
S from Mishiwaka, I see your point Baiting (having a dog attack and kill a full grown bull) would make a much more docile and gentle animal than dog fighting. Oh no it wouldn't!! And by the way thank you for pointing out that the German shepard didn't need to be shot, they just took it away and it was euthanized. The pit bull on the other hand HAD to be shot and killed just to get it off the poor guy it was chewing on. I think the point to realize here is that certain breeds do have more of a disposition for violence than others and should only be owned by people who know that and can deal with them properly.

Posted by: I&P on May 1, 2008 at 06:00 PM
I never ONCE implied that I let my dog roam the neighborhood. As a matter of fact, I become very irate when I walk her on a LEASH (AND WITH A POOP BAG) and neighbor dogs charge out of their yards. I trust her TEMPERAMENT. And, if you feel the pound workers are "breed ignorant", then shame on you for not doing your own homework. As a shelter VOLUNTEER, every spring we are inundated with pure-bred puppies that were purchased from breeders for Christmas gifts and are no longer "cute" because they are untrainable. As for your desire to share your ob/gyn's surprise, gee..thanks. Next time you're there, ask him to prescribe some hormones to alleviate your masculine behaviors. As for emotional, yes I am when animals have to suffer because of ignorant humans. And, my dog is a shelter dog and the BEST I have ever had. Of course, I was smart enough to ask questions and research before I adopted. If a shelter is legit, they are not going to feed you a bunch of hooey.

Posted by: wayne on May 1, 2008 at 05:19 PM
A dog should be on a leash or tied up at all times. T from South Bend what you said was real stupid. People can tell the difference from a stray dog and a dog that has been taken cared of. But like I said before I have two children and I'm not going to take any chances. Better safe than sorry!!!!!!!

Posted by: Connie Location: Warsaw on May 1, 2008 at 04:57 PM
BTW I&P- By "trust" I meant the slack-handed method of turning the dog loose because you "think" you've shown it where the boundaries are, and expect it to stay within them. Only a fool would do that, or "trust" their dog around strange people or animals, or in unusual or stressful situations. "Trusting" your dog is good, if you mean you don't mind your children playing with it or don't have to worry about guests being mauled at the dinner table. But, feeling free to let your dog hang out in the front yard near the road without benefit of leash or fence because you "trust" your dog is being selfish. Bikers and walkers don't know your dog, nor should they have to feel threatened or worried because you are so sure your dog will stop at some magical point invisible to the passers-by. Besides, no matter how well-trained the dog, they are still dogs, and often give in to instinct when you least expect it. Hence-THE STATE LEASH LAW-not the state "trust your dog" law.

Posted by: Connie Location: Warsaw on May 1, 2008 at 04:48 PM
I&P-As a matter of fact, I have adopted many dogs through-out the years. I realize the adoption requirements are a teensy-tiny bit better than they used to be. But the fact remains that those dogs ended up in the "pound" because no one wanted them or those who thought they did discovered reality to be harder than the fuzzy warm-hearted images promoted by the adoption crazed animal-social workers. Every dog I adopted turned out to be a problem. They were always much larger than the BREED-IGNORANT pound workers guessed, and often had terrible habits from being raised improperly. I've only ever purchased one pup in my life and he was such a breeze to train I will never adopt again. Besides, where do you think all those dogs came from in the first place?-the pound fairy? My main point was to raise the bar on dog ownership & enforce existing laws. BTW-my ob/gyn will be astounded to find I am "macho" & "a real man". Like all your other emotional accusations, that was wrong.

Posted by: Willie Location: Niles on May 1, 2008 at 04:37 PM
No offense, but: What's a gun slinging liberal?

Posted by: S Location: Mishawaka on May 1, 2008 at 04:27 PM
Connie-if you studied the breed like you claim, you would know that they were originally bred for BAITING not FIGHTING. They only began to be trained for fighting when they outlawed baiting. You would also know that ANY pit that turned on its human was killed. They were trained to be loyal to humans and protect their human at any cost. ANY dog can be used for fighting. Not just pits. And as far as the dog tax goes, this still is not changing anything but costing us RESPONSIBLE owners to have to shell out more money. The ones who misuse the dogs are still doing it, and they always will, they just won't LICENSE their dogs! And you would also know that when it comes to a pit, these are not a dog that is adopted out so any responsible owner has taken the time to think out the decision to own one before hand. Especially considering how much WE pay to keep them and how controlled WE must keep them because of the media stereotyping. Notice the shepard mix wasn't shot.

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on May 1, 2008 at 03:52 PM
I&P/Local, It's probably none of my business, but having argued with plenty of liberals who told me I shouldn't be able to have a gun or hunt. I was just wondering where all these gun slinging Liberals live? And as far as trusting your dog more than most people- If the only people you know are gang bangers and thugs, I understand why. But you should still realize the people are more valuable And you need to keep your dog contained for the safety of others. If you can't realize this, seek help.

Posted by: I&P Location: Local on May 1, 2008 at 11:41 AM
Connie from Warsaw...if you ever attempted to adopt a dog vs. purchase from a backyard breeder, you will find that the shelters are criticized because of the requirements to adopt. Those requirements better ensure that the dog will be cared for properly. Backyard breeders will sell you an inbred animal with no regard to the type of environment or owner experience. And to all of you critics out there...I DO trust my dog. All of you gun slinging liberals out there probably have deer head "trophies" hanging on your walls because you are so macho and that is your evidence of being a real man. Yes, there were people injured and yes,that is a terrible thing, and yes the owners should be held liable. How many dog attacks do you read about? A whole lot less than thug attacks and gang bang attacks. I trust my dog more than I do most people. Sad circumstances due to ignorant owners.

Posted by: J Location: Mishawaka on May 1, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Amen to "Not a people lover." I agree with that I would rather have my life filled with dogs then violent and aggressive people that would rather shoot you than look at you. I also believe it is the responsibility of how the owner brings up the animal and if it has been abused. That is the only way they know to protect themselves. When we have strays I always try to find out if they have a tag, sometimes they get out of the house by mistake;kind like the toddler that escaped from his home.

Posted by: vet2b Location: elkhart on May 1, 2008 at 11:09 AM
Just because a dog bites someone doesn't mean that they have been abused or mistreated. There are many reasons a dog may attack.. Nutrition is one, If they feel nervous for some reason. the list goes on.. If it is the dogs first time then shouldn't they just be quaritined for a length of time.. To just kill the animal is just cruel. Take the animal to the vet and see what can be done to detour this from happening again or have them go thru obedience schooling.. It saddens me to think people feel that they are just animals..:( they are part of someones family..

Posted by: Connie Location: Warsaw on May 1, 2008 at 10:59 AM
As I mentioned in my previous post, dogs are unpredictable. They can be trained, contained, managed and controlled, but only a fool would "trust" them enough to think they would "never" hurt a flea. I've been snapped at/bitten by a lot of different breeds, but being charged by a stray pitbull-in MY yard was by far the scariest because they ARE FIGHTING DOGS. That IS why they were developed. And they are huge with strong jaws. I was terrified BECAUSE I KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT THEM AFTER STUDYING THE BREED FOR YEARS-because I thought I might want one. I like dogs as much as anyone, but I HATE STRAYS. I have often told my family how stupid I think charging anything under $25/year($150-unneutered) is for a dog tax, because it takes some of the need for thought out of the decision to get a dog. I also think communities should bring back the good old-fashioned dog-catcher, and deal with unwanted dogs properly. And, how smart is begging people to adopt dogs, so that many of them can end up strays?

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on May 1, 2008 at 09:42 AM
jill/April 30. It's people like you who worry me. Your more concerned with someone not shooting some potentially dangerous stray dog than you are about the 4 people who got bit, 3 of which had to go to the hospital. It's this attitude that somehow the value of a human life is not any greater than that of a dog's that disturbs every well-balanced person on the planet. Dogs are not people, they are animals! And if they happen to be the love of some childs life then do the child a favor and keep them at home, because even the love of a childs life can kill and maim if put in the wrong circumstance.

Posted by: Laina Location: Mishawaka on May 1, 2008 at 09:36 AM
I don't think pits should be discriminated against for being protective. As many of you said it all has to do with how the dog was raised. If it was raised properly, then there should be no problems. But when raised improperly one can not take the chance of it attacking simply for the fact that they can do an insane amount of damage in a short time. I have 3 dogs - one is a chow/shepard mix (that I got when she was older than 1 year) who is stubborn as all get out! I also have a Siberian Husky who is the dumbest dog ever and would squat and pee before she'd ever get in a confrontation with a person. The other is a 40 pound terrier mix of some kind. Out of those three breeds, the terrier would be the first to mess someone up if they messed with me. She is the most loving and affectionate dog to me, but if someone so much as lays a finger on me and she thinks I may be in trouble, she will instantly be on them. You can't judge the dog by the breed.

Posted by: Kim E Location: Argos on May 1, 2008 at 07:19 AM
Check out the statistics on dog bites in the USA. It's an alarming number and most are unprovoked by dogs the owners claim never had a mean bone in their body. dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/statistics.html Pits and pit mixes at the top of the list. And to all you pit owners of sweet dogs. We don't want to hear your pleas to stop condemning your dogs. The majority are poorly bred by people with less then a clue of genetics. Many (NOT ALL)people who own them bought them because they know people will be intimidated and then cry out 'Please accept my dog' he is a teddy bear crap.. Many owners of these dogs are aggressive themselves and it shows in their plea's/demands to attempt to force everyone in the world to accept their choice of dog. The responsible pit owners and breeders are not the ones crying. They have theirs trained, bought from someone who has a clue and are enjoying their pets not concerned about what others think. SPAY AND NEUTER. Stop breeding in your back yard with out a clue.

Posted by: Kim on May 1, 2008 at 07:03 AM
Dogs attacking unprovoked happens for many reasons. Back yard breeders and puppy mills inbreeding on dogs with poor temperaments. Lack of training and responsibilty from the owners. Grain filled crapinabag species innapropriate foods, over vaccination, Rabies vaccinations, People staring dogs in the eye which in dog language is saying 'I Challenge you'. Do you homework on vaccine damage which includes sudden aggression, Buy your pets from responsible breeders, Feed species appropriate foods (RAW feeding). Limit vaccines and stop being bullied by vets and techs to do otherwise, Get a fence and put a lock on it to avoid escaping, Attend obedience classes. Learn something about responsible pet ownership, spay and neuter to avoid creating more pets with ill temperaments and health. 2 nice dogs does not mean your whole back yard bred litter will be nice. There are 60 dogs in 5 generations and unless you know most of them, you don't know what you are creating. Temperaments can be inherited.

Posted by: jill on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:51 PM
To NOT A DOG LOVER--You say you're not a dog lover so I assume then you've never owned a dog or even been around a dog. When people say their dog is "good with kids," they know what they're talking about and their statement is true. My dog lets my 13 month old crawl all over him; my kids play with his ears and tail, and he just sits there. If it gets to the point where he doesn't like it, he gets up and walks away. NEVER has he even so much as growled at them or given them a dirty look. He's been that way all his life with any child to ever pet him. To shoot and kill a stray carte blanche is unfair. Give the owner a chance. You don't know why or how the dog escaped. Have a little compassion and mercy. The dog you just killed very well could have been the love a child's life. You can't justify the killing by saying, "Oh, sweetie, it was just a dog. You'll be fine." That dog was the child's best friend. As for a fence, some neighborhoods don't allow fences.

Posted by: jill on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:37 PM
To RUSSELL JONES--did you NOT read what Shay wrote just before you???!!!??? What a bigoted, HATEFUL, narrow-minded thing to say. Your opinion obviously stems from never owning a pitbull or any dog, for that matter, and allowing media HYPE to sway your thinking. Before you say something do some research.

Posted by: Me Location: Mishawaka on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:28 PM
Shoot the SCUM who abuse and don't take care of their pets...Not the animals!!!!

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on Apr 30, 2008 at 09:20 PM
BSL or not, isn't the point here. The point is dogs, any dog, can be dangerous. People need to control their dog. Whether it's a Pit Bull or a Toy Poodle it has teeth and can bite. But obviously a bigger dog takes more effort to control than a small one and is also capable of doing more damage. Therefore it does make sense to suggest that a person considering a larger breed dog should have to come up with some sort of proof they can handle it. But the bottom line is, if you have it you ARE responsible for it so keep it under control! The publics safety demands it!!

Posted by: Rissa on Apr 30, 2008 at 08:40 PM
Breeds such as the pit bull or the rott or the German shepherd were originally designed and created for specific reasons. To accomplish the job the dogs were bred for, traits such as strength, dominance, and stubborness were sought after and woven into the breed at the roots. Because of this, the average joe-moron can't handle the dog. Like some people's huskies, the dogs are smarter than the owners and soon become the menaces all idle powers become. To prevent this, only people willing to pay the price-financial and educational, should be allowed to own these dogs-WHO HAVE ALL PROVEN THEMSELVES MORE DANGEROUS THAN AVERAGE, BY BEING INVOLVED IN MORE THAN THE AVERAGE INCIDENTS. This is not discriminating against the breeds-it's discriminating against laziness, stupidity, and fad-buying. Just like getting a CDL is not discriminating against any one group of people, just against traffic accidents.

Posted by: RUSSELL JONES Location: SOUTH BEND on Apr 30, 2008 at 08:25 PM
I THINK THAT ALL PITBULLS SHOULD BE PUT DOWN THEY ARE USED FOR NOTHING BUT ATTACTING PEOPLE AND FOR PROTECTING DRUG HOUSES THEY SERVE NO GOOD PERPOSES DOGS NEVER RUN AROUND MY HOUSE EVER PEOPLE HAVE TO BECOME RESPONCABLE FOR THERE PETS I HAVE AN AKITA SHE HAS NEVER BITTEN ANYONE IT IS ALL THE WAY U TRAN THEM PITBULLS ARE NO GOOD THEY JUST FLY OFF THE HANDLE FOR NO REASON JUST LIKE TODAY AND LOOK WHAT HAPPENED GROWN ADULTS AND THAT POOR KID LETS JUST GET RID OF PITBULLS AND ALOT OF TROUBLE WILL GO AWAY WITH ATTACTS ON HUMANS.

Posted by: Not a people lover Location: Osceola on Apr 30, 2008 at 07:25 PM
This is to not a dog lover in South Bend....I agree that some dogs won't give second thought to biting someone for no good reason if they have been abused, neglected etc., by their owners or others; but ANY GIVEN DAY OR NIGHT...I would rather walk into a cage with dogs that I don't know versus walking down the streets anywhere in SOUTH BEND, becasue quite frankly your chances of getting shot or stabbed in that city are far better than getting bit by a dog. I do hope and prayer for a speedy recovery of the individuals who were bit though!

Posted by: Shay Location: mishawaka on Apr 30, 2008 at 06:47 PM
its sad that there are such ignorant people in the world. i have 3 dogs, 2 are pits. i have small kids and a cat. my pits are giant scaredy cats. my cat and borger collie are the ones in charge. maybe before people pass judgement they should be informed. the chei inspector for the humane society has a pitt and said that out of every breed out there, pits are the best family dog. so dont believe everything you hear. people are so gulliable. I think its humorous how the news puts a negative slant or twist on just about everything they report. BSL stinks. its the same as racism... lets go back to segregation, its the same thing. animals are protected just as people are under the law and should not be banned simply because they are born. stop being so ignorant and arrogant... your shallow virtues are showing through.

Posted by: Cody Location: Mishawaka on Apr 30, 2008 at 06:38 PM
Any breed of dog can be taught to attack or be a guard dog. Unfortunatly everyone with a dog does not think alike. Not everyone loves their dog like family, or gives it the care it deserves. Some people shouldn't even be allowed to own a dog. I get sick of people discriminating against American Pit Bull Terriers, because of their owners poor, or lack of responsibility. BSL(breed specific legislation)is plain racism. It is a shame people know nothing about the American Pitbull Terrier. The media loves to hype people up about the breed. APBT's are the only dog that have been bred NOT to bite a human. I have 2 APBT's and a borde collie. I would be more worried about my collie biting a stranger than my APBT. People really need to do some research on the breed before they open their mouth. JUDGE THE DEED, NOT THE BREED!

Posted by: Vicki Location: Goshen on Apr 30, 2008 at 05:48 PM
Here we go again. . . only this time people were injured and for no good reason. The incident with the dog running loose and getting shot can now present a different perspective. You cannot trust a strange dog no matter what! Unknown instincts can be set off initiating an attack mode especially if the dog has been trained to protect owner/property. How unfortunate that the dog suffers and not the owner. People need to realize how important it is to control their pets at ALL TIMES and preferably not train them to attack especially when unwarranted.

Posted by: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008 at 04:53 PM
I've worked with animals for many, many years, I've had Rottweillers all my life,and still do, never had one that's bitten anyone or displayed aggression, I'm all too familiar with BSL from owning Rotts. Two friends of mine adopted pitbulls, both dogs were very nice, both friends have no longer got the dogs due to aggression issues, one of the pits killed my friends other dog (which was a small dog) As much as I hate to say it, I would never consider owning a pitbull. Too many horror stories, a perfectly good family dog ruined due to human abuse and neglect. The Pitbull is the most abused canine. Very Sad.

Posted by: M Location: V on Apr 30, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Yep Willie, some people don't have dogs as pets anymore, they're security systems. And as far as people becoming anti-social I'd bet someone would shoot a neighborhood dog these days instead of talking it out or going a less violent route.

Posted by: are you totally stupid on Apr 30, 2008 at 03:41 PM
I have a Siberian Tiger who was raised by humans and treated very well and is as gentle as a kitten. Oh, you still have to be careful because on that one occasion if it should, you know, out of the blue, bite you, well, then it's all over. But you have to treat it right. Siberian tigers are an extension of their owners. Oh, all Cats attack, even little tabby kittens. Let's out law every Cat in the world! Huh! I'm smart!

Posted by: Karla Location: Culver on Apr 30, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Dear Teacher I hope I never have to sit in one of your classes. You can not even spell "lesson" correctly. How sad.

Posted by: Semi Literate Location: Mishawaka on Apr 30, 2008 at 03:10 PM
Teacher, the word you wanted is "lesson" not "lession", you pedantic moron.

Posted by: Willie Location: Niles on Apr 30, 2008 at 02:44 PM
People have steadily become more antisocial with the amount of TV, video game, and internet time logged throughout the day; and interactions that used to take place personally have become more impersonal. Dogs are merely an extension of their owners, and therein lies the problem. (Who remembers the friendly neighborhood dog that was always around as a kid? Of course back then you knew all your neighbors and their kids and dogs.) Dogs need to be trained and disciplined just like kids; so who's to blame when dogs are aggressive and vicious?

Posted by: Teacher on Apr 30, 2008 at 02:36 PM
OK, class, here's our lessions for today. "Your" is a possessive pronoun. It means you have ownership of something. "You're" is a contraction that means "you are". They are not interchangeable. The second lession is the difference between "there", "their" and "they're". "There" is a location. "Their" is a possessive pronoun. "They're" is a contraction that means "they are". They are not interchangeable either. Does everyone understand? I'm sure you do.

Posted by: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008 at 02:24 PM
We have a completely fenced in 5 acres for our black lab. We keep the gate shut but when someone comes over and she is out they always ask if she bites. I say she never has, but then again she is a dog. She is the sweetest dog I know, but she is still a dog.

Posted by: Rissa on Apr 30, 2008 at 02:24 PM
Pitbulls, like all of the breeds with questionable reputations require stronger control than average. Like driving a semi instead of a car or pickup, owning a "tough" breed should require a special permit/license-preferably only after passing a test to prove you are capable of properly managing the dog. That would eliminate a lot of people who get a pit because it's "cool". And, if all dog licenses were more than the usual $5/yr, people might stop and ask themselves if they really want one after all. As it is, people take home a "cute" puppy or a "cool" dog, only to discover that there is more work involved than they want to deal with. Then the community gets forced to train the dog to stay out of places or to clean up after the dog, or to watch out so they don't run over the dog-all so some slack-a** can "own" a dog. Any dog caught straying should mean automatic removal of pets from the owner. Then, maybe they will take containment seriously.

Posted by: Keith on Apr 30, 2008 at 02:22 PM
Terrified, is it you or the dog that leaves the mess?

Posted by: Disappointed Location: Michigan on Apr 30, 2008 at 01:39 PM
I'm really disappointed that people are picking at the pit bull. They are a popular breed right now so there are going to be more insidents because dumb people are getting them to be cool. I have two pits and they are less likly to bit than my german shepherd. The difference is I got one pit at 3 months old vs my shepherd at 8 months. It's all in how they are socialized and raised. More people are scared of my shepherd than my pits. If you look back when Rotties were popular they were discrimated against like the pits are now. What breed will they pick at next? Some dogs which includes all breeds.. have a bad tick and need a good strong owner who knows how to train it. There are no such thing as bad dogs just bad owners. I have a german shepherd down the road from me who attacked the neighbor's rottie mix. But you don't see that in the paper..All you see is when pits are bad so yeah people are going to think bad of them. If you live in town contain your pet no matter what it is.

Posted by: Jackie Location: Next Door on Apr 30, 2008 at 01:08 PM
To Bill, when you or one of your loved ones gets attacked by a 'sweet' dog..I bet you will be the one thinking YOUR an idiot, while bandaging your wounds in a hosptial somewhere. Unless you hook up with the womam who shot the dog..Where is a gun when you need it?

Posted by: Not a dog lover Location: South Bend on Apr 30, 2008 at 12:41 PM
To Brit and all the naive dog owners:ALL DOGS CAN ATTACK! Even the most docile dog will attack. Shoot all stray dogs, and if a dog gets loose, kill it. If a dog attacks another dog, or a human being, or is raised to fight, put the dog down immediately. The pecking order is simple:Humans first, animals second. Put up the fence(keep it in good condition), use a leash, and PLEASE stop saying that your dog will not hurt a flea, and is "Good with kids". All dogs breeds attack, and all dogs will bite. When did the needs of animals become first, and the dog bite victims become suspects? Again, it's humans first, then animals.

Posted by: Mr. Location: Obvious on Apr 30, 2008 at 12:31 PM
Everyone's a dog lover until it's your kid that gets mauled to within an inch of their life.

Posted by: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008 at 12:30 PM
cut the dogs tail off

Posted by: Reasoning Location: Mishawaka on Apr 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM
And I am sure these owners said, their dogs wouldnt hurt a flea, good dogs, never harmed anywone. etc. NO one knows when a dog will turn. Some never do, and others will. It happens every day. They are animals. period... Training them helps, but instinct is stronger. Those of you who have NeVer had a dog turn, great...but never say never.

Posted by: Tina Location: South Bend on Apr 30, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Its funny no one is mentioning the shepard and just going after the fact it is a pitt. I have a pitt and is sweet as can be. Do your research, there are more attacks by OTHER breeds than there are with pitts. Pitts are called the Nanny dog, and they didnt get that name by accident. They have gotten a bad rep over the years and are making a come back to being back to being a family dog. I have a 15 month old and dont have any questions lingering. Any animal can attack and bite, its not just pitts.

Posted by: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Actually TOM, I happen to know the officer who shot the dog and he does not feel good at all about it. You're spelling is as bad as your knowledge about anything. Too bad you were not there so the dog could bite you in the !@#$.

Posted by: Bill on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:53 AM
For Tom....you are an idiot!

Posted by: Mike on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:38 AM
So, T, what you're saying is dog owners are all batspit insane bloodthirsty child muderers? I think I agree with that.

Posted by: Brit Location: Elkhart on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:38 AM
I have a pitbull and she won't hurt a flee. She is good with people n children.. so in this case it is how they are raised.. if someone says get-um. they will that is just how pits are.. but the owner should get into trouble it is sad they had to shoot the dog. What about the owner.. my prayers are out for every victim, family n friends MAY GOD BLESS

Posted by: V Location: SOUTH BEND on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:37 AM
I have owned several different breeds of dogs over many years and have never had any problem with a dog escaping its yard or biting anyone. Almost all dogs can be trained to behave. It's usually the fault of the dog owner. The one that doesn't bother to train the dog or the owner that hasn't a clue how to train a dog or even find someone who can. Just as there are those that should never be a parent of a human, there are those that should never be the parent of a dog. Both children and pets need guidance, love and attention, and some people just don't provide that.

Posted by: wittgenstein on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM
Wow, I can't imagine having children and living in the same neighborhood where someone owns a dog like that. Wow. Psycho. Those dogs are legal around here? Add that to the list of reasons I'm leaving the midwest. Wow. Psycho. I'm not raising kids in a city where those things are legal. That's just weird.

Posted by: Anonymous on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:15 AM
To Ban Pit Bulls, You are very ignorant to the breed. BUT you had nothing to say about the German Shephard. You need some education on breeds and why they turn the way they do. It's all in the handler, not the dog

Posted by: Terrified Location: Mishawaka on Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM
This kinda thing just strikes the fear of G-d into me. The idea that you can just be in your yard and some big dog will come in and bite your ears off ... just insane. I hope they do something about this, and the mess dog owners leave behind too. Theres a guy stops outside my house EVERY night and drops a huge mess on my lawn, never cleans it up.

Posted by: A Location: SBI on Apr 30, 2008 at 10:57 AM
I like that one person's solution is to sue people for millions who can't keep their dogs locked up. Don't you think if they had millions, they'd have a better fence to keep them contained?!

Posted by: T Location: South Bend on Apr 30, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Wayne, when you shoot someone's dog for simply straying onto your yard, you risk a maniac coming back to slaughter your entire family. It is commonly referred to as "kharma".

Posted by: Conley Location: Warsaw on Apr 30, 2008 at 09:50 AM
With all of the people who let their dogs roam, it's rather surprising that both dogs in this story were fenced. However, the dog owners are still 100% liable for all damages, because it isn't their job to put the animal in a fence, but to keep it contained-which which means making sure the fence CAN contain them. And it's a bit of a stretch for someone to refer to the animal that sent his friend to the hospital as a "nice dog or well trained." Not by my standards, it isn't. But, every person who selfishly lets their dogs roam claims it's "a teddy bear" or "a sweet dog". They are sometimes arrogant enough to claim "everybody loves him", but the truth is most people deal with strays constantly and we are all tired of it. We shouldn't need advice on how to deal with vicious dogs while walking down public streets-even in the country. Not only is it AGAINST THE LAW, but all dogs have teeth, which means ALL DOGS BITE when their limited minds tell them to.

Posted by: Tom Location: Leesburg on Apr 30, 2008 at 09:25 AM
This is terrible. This article ends with advice on how to act when confronted with a dangerous dog. Just like the advice I've read for people who hike in bear country. The only differance is this ISN'T wild bear country it's in the city and the only reason we have to be concerned is because of irresponsible dog owners. It's about time people took the potential danger of their animals seriously. Just like the Normans in the Starke county case everyone thinks their dog is just a big teddy bear or like Benman says here that "it was a nice dog and well trained" yet it attacked 2 people and had to be shot and killed to get it to stop. TO ALL DOG OWNERS!! your dog is potentially dangerous and you have no business not keeping it under control AT ALL TIMES!! And that's regardless of size, they all have teeth that can make injuries bad enough to send anyone to the emergency room. And as this article shows part of the responsibility is to check the fences & leashes security and strength.

Posted by: Helen Location: St Joe County on Apr 30, 2008 at 09:23 AM
My daughter was attacked by a dog last year and we would like to know if anyone knows of a support group for the victims of dog attacks.

Posted by: SaraK Location: Elkhart on Apr 30, 2008 at 08:41 AM
It's sad that the owner was upset, however the police did what they had to to protect everyone. I'm a huge animal lover, but some breeds are just more dangerous than others, no matter how well they are raised. On another note: please spay or neuter your animals. The overpopulation of our beloved dogs and cats is such a sad situation. Just go to our local humane society and walk through. I cry every time.

Posted by: Laina Location: Mishawaka on Apr 30, 2008 at 08:34 AM
It is quite common for there to be loose dogs in my neighborhood. I walk my dogs in a 2 mile diameter around the neighborhood and I don't know how many times I have had dogs follow us home. Last Monday one dog jumped on top of my little dog that I had with me. The owners were outside with it and just didn't feel like putting a leash on it. I was lucky that my dog didn't snap on it because she doesn't like other dogs intimidating her. I don't know how I would have gotten them apart if they had begun to fight since there was no leash on the other dog to pull them apart. I may start carrying mace or something. There are 2 other houses within that 2 mile diamter where the dogs could easily jump the fence. One is a rott and the other looks like a pit mix. The pit mix got out once and went after us, I picked my dog up so the dog couldn't get her while my friend went to the door and got the trashy owner to come get their animal.

Posted by: mother of 2 Location: warsaw on Apr 30, 2008 at 08:25 AM
it sad that they had to shoot the dog, they should of shot the owner. because it,s his fault that the dog attack the police,I have a pit that won,t even bite flee.s much less humans it.s the way there brought up. just like kids!

Posted by: BAN PIT BULLS!!!! Location: EVERYWHERE!!!!! on Apr 30, 2008 at 08:22 AM
I have an idea why the pit-mix turned violent. Maybe because those dogs are bred to be fighters & they should be banned!!!! Several other countries have banned pits, so why can't the U.S.? Some breeds are bred for hunting or to have other characteristics-so, thats what is instinctive for them. Pits are bred to be fighters & attackers. They should ALL be banned! As for the German Shepherd, some dogs are biters-not sure about that one. I hope the child is ok & not seriously injured.

Posted by: Anonymous Location: Elkhart on Apr 30, 2008 at 06:20 AM
How unfortunate for both the victims and dogs in these situations! The owners should do a better job of keeping their dog in their own environment. This past week we have picked moral mushrooms on our "own" property three times. We have had to carry a butcher knife for protection in case the rottwieler who will occasionally bark at us would get loose "again". Dogs do make great pets and offer protection of our property. It is horrible not feeling safe in your own yard. This is an eye opener for us to get ahold of the animal control. Summer is coming and we do not want any unfortunate cases like this in our neighborhood. We will be out in our yard soon enjoying our children, gardening, mowing...We have the right to be safe doing so.

Posted by: lawsuit on Apr 30, 2008 at 05:57 AM
Anyone who can not keep their dog reined in should be sued for millions.

Posted by: wayne on Apr 30, 2008 at 05:33 AM
All of you people that was hating on that woman last week, this is a prime example of what dogs can do. They are unpredictable because they are animals. I have two kids and if a stray dog comes in my yard he's dead.

Posted by: Tôm Location: South Bend on Apr 30, 2008 at 02:37 AM
I bet the South Bend Police officers enjoyed shhoting that dog as much as they did arresting the distraught owner. You know they were laughing hard. Well, all we can do is wait till the fall when the trial will begin in Hammond.

Posted by: Connie Location: Warsaw on Apr 30, 2008 at 01:15 AM
We hear about terrifying incidents like these, and yet there are still people out there defending the idea of letting dogs roam. I hope they see this report and learn something! The state of Indiana, like all states, has a leash law which is applicable wherever you live in the state. Pets belong on leashes or in fences. These incidents clearly show how unpredictable animals can be. Keep your pets on leashes, or in fences, and supervised to prevent injuries or deaths to people, or to the pets themselves. Besides, it's just rude to expect your neighbors to tolerate your dog (and the messes they leave) in their yards. Owners of strays are liable for any damage the pet causes, so keeping them home may also save you money.

Posted by: Bill on Apr 30, 2008 at 12:19 AM
I'm an animal lover and this saddens me. I know the police didn't want to kill the second dog, but there wasn't much choice.


Five Day
WNDU News Poll
There are currently no active polls at this time.
Click here to view other polls on our site and past poll results.
MichianaGuide.com